Today was the first day of public impeachment hearings with Acting Ambassador Bill Taylor and State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent testifying.
On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we provided exclusive live analysis of Adam Schiff’s phony, lacking due process first day of public impeachment inquiry hearings. You can watch them for yourself by clicking here.
What we heard during the opening statements by the witnesses seemed to me to be an esoteric discussion of foreign policy towards Ukraine, not an impeachment hearing. ACLJ Director of Government Affairs Thann Bennett agreed:
The main takeaway on substance is this is a policy dispute. Chairman Schiff in his opening narrative said the President froze aid that “the Foreign Service supported.” So what? Ultimately the American people elected the President to make those decisions so if he makes one that the Foreign Service apparatus doesn’t support, that’s not relevant to this inquiry.
A highlight of the hearing was when Adam Schiff likely misled the American people again in response to Congressman Jim Jordan’s question:
Just to ask a clarifying question. Do you anticipate when we might vote on the ability to have the whistleblower in front of us- something you, of the four hundred thirty five members of congress you are the only member who knows who that individual is. And your staff is the only staff of any member of congress who’s had a chance to talk with that individual - we would like that opportunity. When might that happen in this proceeding today?
Adam Schiff’s response: “First, as the gentleman knows, that’s a false statement. I do not know the identity of the whistleblower, and I’m determined to make sure that identity is protected.”
Thann Bennett made another really good point in his response to Adam Schiff:
It’s awfully hard to keep up with Chairman Schiff, he now claims he doesn’t know who the “whistleblower” is. By my count that’s the third position he’s had over the course of the last four weeks.
Remember, this is the same Adam Schiff who initially lied about his staff’s contact with the “whistleblower”.
House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes said during his opening statement at the hearing:
After the spectacular implosion of their Russia hoax on July 24th, in which they spent years denouncing any Republican who ever shook hands with a Russian, on July 25th they turned on a dime and now claim the real malfeasance is republicans’ dealings with Ukraine. In the blink of an eye we’re asked to simply forget about Democrats on this committee falsely claiming they had more than circumstantial evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russians.
The biggest issue politically is the Democrats want to take down the President. What are they going to do or think when the Senate fully exonerates the President? This is going to go into the ash heap like the Mueller Probe.
You can listen to the entire episode here.
As we aggressively fight to restore the Constitution and defeat the Deep State and the Left’s attempts to shred it, have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
Surprise, surprise – Three out of four elitist law professors agree that the President you elected should be impeached. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed another day of impeachment hearings, this time before the House Judiciary Committee. What is happening in the Judiciary Committee today...
There’s a breaking report that Attorney General William Barr has told associates at the Department of Justice that he disagrees with the Inspector General on one key finding in the upcoming report next week, that the FBI had enough information to justify launching an investigation into members of...
The White House and the White House Counsel will not participate in the sham impeachment hearings before the House Judiciary Committee. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed the letter that White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler stating that...
This impeachment inquiry is about a policy dispute and a turf war amongst unelected bureaucrats over money being sent to a foreign country, Ukraine, and apparent frustration that they were left out of the process. In this case, some career bureaucrats wanted to be involved but weren’t, so a number...