Radio Recap – Impeachment Inquiry: He Said, She Said | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

The public impeachment hearings continue. There’s a lot of “he said, she said” going on. The only thing that is pretty clear is what President Trump DIDN’T say.

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we discussed the continuation of the impeachment hearings.

For the House Majority it was probably the most key day for them. Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified.

While there’s been some confusion about the opening of his testimony, Ambassador Sondland made it abundantly clear that the President never, ever ordered him to do a quid pro quo. It was never tied to any aide.

He admitted that he interpreted certain things this way but when he was asked about what the President ever said in the following exchange with Stephen R. Castor, the House Intelligence Committee Counsel for the Minority

CASTOR: Did the President ever tell you personally about any preconditions for anything?
SONDLAND:No
CASTOR: Ok so the President never told you about any preconditions for the aid to be released.
SONDLAND: No
CASTOR: The President never told you about any preconditions for a White House meeting?
SONDLAND: Personally? No.

He said NO.

As of now, this was supposedly their best witness. There may be some other witnesses but as of right now, this was their chance to convince the country that the President directly ordered something that was inappropriate.

Instead, Ambassador Sondland testified that the President did not.

 

 Castor asked Ambassador Sondland the following during the hearing:

You know, we have all this back and forth, but you know, as we get to the end here, you don’t have records, you don’t have your notes because you didn’t take notes, you don’t have a lot of recollections, I mean, this is the trifecta of unreliability. Isn’t that true?

Ambassador Sondland had made it a point to mention that he didn’t take notes.

ACLJ Senior Counsel and Director of Policy Harry Hutchison made the following point on the show:

Look at a couple of questions. Did President Trump, according to Ambassador Sondland, condition military aid on launching an investigation of the 2016 campaign? No.

Was the President primarily interested in understanding the role, if any, that Ukraine played in launching the investigation into the Trump campaign? Yes, but there is no conditions tied to any of these meetings.

No quid pro quo is the takeaway from my analysis.

And I agree with Professor Hutchison. No quid pro quo.

We also discussed yesterday’s testimony, where Ambassador Volker and Timothy Morrison were questioned by Congresswoman Elise Stefanik:

STEFANIK: Did Ukraine open an investigation into the Bidens, Mr. Morrison?
MORRISON: Not to my knowledge ma’am.
STEFANIK: Ambassador Volker?
VOLKER: Not to my knowledge, either.
STEFANIK: Did either of you ever have any evidence of ‘quid pro quo?’ Mr. Morrison? Ambassador Volker?
MORRISON: No ma'am.
VOLKER: I did not.
STEFANIK: Any evidence of bribery?
MORRISON: No ma’am.
VOLKER: No ma’am.
STEFANIK: Any evidence of treason?
MORRISON: No ma’am.
VOLKER: No evidence of treason.
STEFANIK: With that, I yield back.

None of the witnesses have testified that President Trump told them to do anything improper. This is simply more sham impeachment from Adam Schiff.

You can listen to the entire episode here.

Restore the Constitution. Don’t Shred It.

Constitution  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to restore the Constitution and defeat the Deep State and the Left’s attempts to shred it, have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Public Policy

JSL: Pelosi Demands Impeachment Articles Against President

By Jordan Sekulow1575585630842

Today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi demanded that articles of impeachment be brought against President Trump from the House of Representatives. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed how Speaker Pelosi’s argument in favor of impeachment centered on a false charge of obstruction. Speaker Pelosi said...

read more

JSL - Analysis: Judiciary Committee Impeachment Hearing

By Jordan Sekulow1575505347833

Surprise, surprise – Three out of four elitist law professors agree that the President you elected should be impeached. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed another day of impeachment hearings, this time before the House Judiciary Committee. What is happening in the Judiciary Committee today...

read more

JSL – Report: AG Barr Disagrees with IG Findings

By Jordan Sekulow1575411995133

There’s a breaking report that Attorney General William Barr has told associates at the Department of Justice that he disagrees with the Inspector General on one key finding in the upcoming report next week, that the FBI had enough information to justify launching an investigation into members of...

read more

JSL: White House Won't Participate in Sham Hearing

By Jordan Sekulow1575328732359

The White House and the White House Counsel will not participate in the sham impeachment hearings before the House Judiciary Committee. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed the letter that White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler stating that...

read more