Radio Recap – Analysis: President’s Team Wraps Up Opening Defense | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Yesterday, the President’s legal team wrapped up its defense on the floor of the U.S. Senate.

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we played clips and provided analysis of the legal team’s defense of President Trump before the U.S. Senate.

ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, acting in his private capacity as a member of President Trump’s legal team, made the following point on the floor of the U.S. Senate yesterday:

The President of the United States, before he was the President, was under an investigation. It was called Crossfire Hurricane. It was an investigation led by the FBI, the Federal Bureau of Investigation. James Comey eventually told the President a little bit about the investigation and referenced the Steele dossier. James Comey, the then Director of the FBI, said it was salacious and unverified. So salacious and unverified that they used it as a basis to obtain FISA warrants. Members, managers here, managers at this table right here said that any discussions on the abuse from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act utilized to get the FISA warrants from the court were conspiracy theories.

I told you at the very beginning, I asked you, put yourselves in the shoes of not just this President, of any President that would have been under this type of attack.  FISA warrants were issued on people affiliated with his campaign. American citizens affiliated with people of his campaign. Citizens of the United States being surveilled pursuant to an order that has now been acknowledged by the very court that issued the order that it was based on a fraudulent presentation.  In fact, evidence specifically changed – changed by the very FBI lawyer who was in charge of this.

Here’s Jay’s powerful close to his presentation yesterday:

We’ve laid out, I believe, a compelling case on what the Constitution requires. When they were in the House of Representatives putting this together, did they go through a constitutionally mandated accommodations process to see if there was a way to come up with something? No, they did not. Did they run to court? No. And the one time it was about to happen, they ran the other way.

Separation of powers means something. It’s not separation of powers and other nonsense. If we’ve reached now, at this very moment in the history of our republic, a bar of impeachment, because you don’t like the President’s policies or you don’t like the way he undertook those policies, because we hear a lot about policies. If partisan impeachment is now the rule of the day, which these members and members of this Senate said should never be the rule of the day. My goodness, they said it—some of them—five months ago.

But then we had the national emergency – a phone call. It’s an emergency, except we’ll just wait. But if partisan impeachment based on policy disagreements, which is what this is, and personal presumptions or newspaper reports and allegations in an unsourced – maybe this is in somebody’s book who’s no longer at the White House – if that becomes the new norm, future Presidents, Democrats, Republicans, will be paralyzed the moment they are elected, before they can even take the oath of office. The bar for impeachment cannot be set this low.

Majority Leader McConnell, Democratic Leader Schumer, House Managers, members of the Senate, danger, danger, danger. These articles must be rejected. The Constitution requires it. Justice demands it.

You can listen to the entire episode with analysis of the events of yesterday’s impeachment trial by ACLJ Senior Military Analyst Wes Smith, ACLJ Director of Policy Harry Hutchison, and me, here.

Restore the Constitution. Don’t Shred It.

Constitution  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to restore the Constitution and defeat the Deep State and the Left’s attempts to shred it, have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Public Policy

Highlighting Our Victories and Preparing for Challenges Ahead

By Mike Pompeo, Senior Counsel for Global Affairs1614789845428

This past Saturday, I spoke at CPAC , and this year because I am no longer America’s top diplomat, I was able to “let it rip.” I spoke about my time as Secretary of State and expressed my justifiable pride in the accomplishments of the Trump administration. How our America First agenda worked. We...

read more

CPAC: Who Is the Future of Conservatism? (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1614636536209

What is the future of the conservative movement and who will lead it? Today on Sekulow , we discuss and give our analysis of CPAC. The big question: Who will lead the conservative movement into the future? CPAC kicked off in Florida towards the end of last week and ended yesterday. You heard from...

read more

Wuhan Lab Eligible for Your Tax Dollars Until 2024 (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1613767221963

Are your taxpayer dollars going to the Wuhan lab that may have been the source of COVID-19? Today on Sekulow , we discuss the fact that the laboratory in Wuhan, China – yes, the same lab that may have unleashed COVID-19 on the world – is still eligible to receive your taxpayer dollars until 2024.

read more

Joe Biden’s Softball CNN Town Hall (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1613597911919

Last night was President Biden’s first town hall with CNN, and the questions were all just a bunch of a softballs . Today on Sekulow, we discussed CNN’s first town hall with President Biden. The media’s relationship with this White House has taken a pretty drastic turn – no accountability.

read more