Radio Recap: Adam Schiff Continues to Mislead Public | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Adam Schiff continues to mislead the public with his impeachment inquiry.

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we provided analysis of where we stand with the impeachment inquiry and discussed yesterday’s public hearings.

A key thing to note is that both Ambassador Taylor and Deputy Assistant Secretary Kent admittedly have not had contact with President Trump and couldn’t with any degree of certainty have knowledge of his thinking.

There’s a growing consensus, not just amongst supporters of the President, that the arguments that Adam Schiff is building the impeachment inquiry on increasingly shaky ground.

George Washington Law Professor and Legal Analyst Jonathan Turley said on CBS, yesterday:

I do think we have to be very cautious when we talk about what the standard is. I think there is a lot to be outraged about, you certainly don’t need a crime for impeachment, but you do need clarity. They’re proceeding on the narrowest basis for impeachment in the history of this country. We’ve never gone up with an impeachment just on abuse of power linked to a single controversy like this.

That is a very slender basis, and I’m not too sure they gained a lot of ground on impeachment as opposed to, all of this does not seem right to many of us.  There’s a lot here that makes us all upset. But the question is, is this really an impeachable offense, and how do you distinguish what the President did here with what Presidents do in conversations with heads of states?

Sometimes I agree with Professor Turley and sometimes I don’t. He’s not a totally partisan guy. I don’t always agree with his constitutional analysis but he is someone who is respected by both sides of the aisle. His analysis is a pretty good take on what the House Majority is trying to pull on the American people.

We also discussed a piece the New Yorker did in 2016, highlighting Obama’s war on whistleblowers.

“His [Obama’s] Justice Department has prosecuted more such cases against whistle-blowers than all previous Administrations combined . . . .”

President Obama prosecuted whistleblowers. President Trump may not like the “whistleblower” but his Administration is not out there prosecuting this or any other whistleblower. There also is the point that the “whistleblower” may not be a real whistleblower.

ACLJ Director of Government Affairs Thann Bennett pointed out that “this is yet another example of a double standard.”

Speaker Pelosi hasn’t even committed to moving forward with impeachment articles, yet. In response to a question at her weekly press conference, she said “I don’t know about that. We haven’t even made a decision to impeach, that’s what the inquiry is about.”

The lingering question about impeachment is: Do they want to just hang impeachment out there during the election process to hurt the President, rather than have the Senate completely exonerate the President?

You can listen to the entire episode here.

Restore the Constitution. Don’t Shred It.

Constitution  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to restore the Constitution and defeat the Deep State and the Left’s attempts to shred it, have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Public Policy

JSL: Pelosi Demands Impeachment Articles Against President

By Jordan Sekulow1575585630842

Today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi demanded that articles of impeachment be brought against President Trump from the House of Representatives. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed how Speaker Pelosi’s argument in favor of impeachment centered on a false charge of obstruction. Speaker Pelosi said...

read more

JSL - Analysis: Judiciary Committee Impeachment Hearing

By Jordan Sekulow1575505347833

Surprise, surprise – Three out of four elitist law professors agree that the President you elected should be impeached. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed another day of impeachment hearings, this time before the House Judiciary Committee. What is happening in the Judiciary Committee today...

read more

JSL – Report: AG Barr Disagrees with IG Findings

By Jordan Sekulow1575411995133

There’s a breaking report that Attorney General William Barr has told associates at the Department of Justice that he disagrees with the Inspector General on one key finding in the upcoming report next week, that the FBI had enough information to justify launching an investigation into members of...

read more

JSL: White House Won't Participate in Sham Hearing

By Jordan Sekulow1575328732359

The White House and the White House Counsel will not participate in the sham impeachment hearings before the House Judiciary Committee. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed the letter that White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler stating that...

read more