U.S. Senate Fails to Defend Infants Born Alive | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

U.S. Senate Fails to Defend Infants Born Alive

By Nathanael Bennett1549402192009

A newborn baby has just been delivered. Breath has filled her lungs for the first time, and she is crying as oxygen replaces amniotic fluid and rushes over her vocal chords. She is alive in every way. She has a heartbeat. She is breathing. She feels pain. She has a soul, and is made in the image of the Creator. Her right to life is unalienable and granted by God. It’s a right that has been secured for her by the Constitution of the United States.

But one thing she does not yet have is the ability to defend herself and fight for that sacred right. That duty, therefore, is left to us. Today we face the harsh reality that as she leaves the womb in a defenseless state, there is a growing movement to deny her right to life-saving care.

Last night, on the floor of the U.S. Senate—and in the wake of a national discussion that escalated when the Governor of Virginia made comments sympathetic to deferential infanticideSen. Ben Sasse (NE) put forward a request asking for unanimous consent for an idea that should have easily been unanimous. The idea was simply that a baby born alive—even after an attempted abortion—must be provided the same legal rights and life-saving care that would be given to any other human being. Not only should this idea be non-controversial, but it is in fact fundamental to the American ideals that every person has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Surely, even in a partisan environment like the current one, the U.S. Senate should be able to find consensus on this most basic and fundamental issue.

Tragically, consensus was not achieved. Sen. Patty Murray (WA) objected, expressing the opinion that the legislation known as the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, was unnecessary and a political stunt. Because of her objection—almost certainly supported by a great number of her pro-abortion colleagues in the Senate—the unanimous consent request failed and the U.S. Senate missed a critical opportunity to stand against infanticide.

The truth is that the issue of life and abortion deeply divides our nation. It’s a grievous reality and one in which we all must engage on behalf of the most innocent and defenseless among us.

But this debate—the one about whether a fully delivered child will be provided life-saving care—is even more basic. In fact, it shouldn’t be a debate at all. It should be an opportunity for those on all sides of the abortion issue to find consensus. It’s just not a close call.

The tragic reality, however, is that the political arm of the abortion lobby is desperate to avoid any line of demarcation when it comes to the question of when life begins. The reason for this reticence is clear—it’s because once a line has been drawn, one must defend where that line is drawn. The abortion industry knows very well that science is on a steady and sustained march that demonstrates conclusive signs of life at earlier and earlier points of gestation. They know that conceding a line must be drawn somewhere will eventually demonstrate the humanity that exists at conception and drive them out of business. So they resist drawing any line at all.

The debate over where that line is drawn is one we must engage. But first, let’s have an honest discussion about today’s debate, and come together to call it what it is.

It is infanticide. It is the killing of an infant. And we should all stand against it.

The U.S. Senate demonstrated a shocking failure to achieve unanimous consent against infanticide. It must now call up the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and insist that every member of its body go on the record for or against this barbaric atrocity that marks our time. While it may take political courage for some to buck the radical agenda of the abortion lobby, that is a very small price to pay—and one we should demand from our leaders—in exchange for defending that baby girl (or boy) who is lying on the table and crying out for help.

She has life.

She has a soul.

She has rights under the Constitution of the United States.

It is our job—and our sacred duty—to speak up for her.

Join us in calling for enactment of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Protect Abortion Survivors Now

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively take legal action to defeat barbaric abortion and defend life, your gift today will be DOUBLED and could help us save lives. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

ACLJ Urges Maryland to Stop Torture of Unborn Babies

By Benjamin P. Sisney1553265723584

As we reported last week, ACLJ attorneys recently appeared before a committee of Maryland state legislators in support of two critical pro-life bills, one requiring meaningful informed consent for women considering abortion, and the other restricting abortions after the child is 20 weeks old in the...

read more

JSL: A New Path for Defunding Planned Parenthood

By Jordan Sekulow1552936910990

Last week we told you about a big win for the state of Ohio in the battle to defund taxpayer funded abortion and save innocent lives. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Planned Parenthood had no constitutional right to state tax funds. On today’s broadcast, we told you about new state efforts,

read more

ACLJ Defends Pro-Life Informed Consent Bill

By Olivia Summers1552663737732

Last Friday, I had the privilege of testifying before Maryland State Legislators as a witness defending the constitutionality of the pro-life Woman’s Right to Know Act. Simply speaking, this bill would require that women seeking an abortion be informed about alternatives to abortion, and about the...

read more

Abortion-Friendly States Trying to Keep Abortion Funding

By Matthew Clark1552594666220

Do you live in a state that wants to force you to pay for free abortions on demand? Odds are high you do, considering the fact that as many as 22 states are suing to uphold taxpayer funding to abortion providers like Planned Parenthood through Title X grants. This despite the fact that the dollars...

read more