Federal Court Upholds Infringement of Pro-Life Speech Rights | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Court Upholds Infringement of Pro-Life Rights

By Francis J. Manion1476825396848

The constitutional rights of pregnancy resource centers and pro-life advocates in California were dealt a serious blow last week by yet another federal court.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s decision refusing to enjoin California’s recently enacted FACT Act, a law that compels pro-life crisis pregnancy centers and pregnancy resource centers to advertise and refer for abortions. We previously reported on the arguments of this case here.

Our clients, LivingWell Medical Clinic, Pregnancy Care Center North Coast, and Confidence Pregnancy Center, are nonprofit pregnancy resource centers that exist to provide women with information about alternatives to abortion. All services are provided free of charge. Each of our clients believes that all human life is sacred and that abortion is a bad option for women. In contrast to Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and their allies in the California state government who dutifully enacted a law sponsored by NARAL, our clients choose to tell women all the facts about abortion. And in discussing abortion, our clients choose to control the when and how they talk about abortion in the context of each client visit. A long line of Supreme Court and other precedents says that the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause protects their right to do just that.

But not so according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Setting itself apart from both the Second and Fourth Circuits, the Court has held that, notwithstanding the First Amendment, California authorities do have the right to force our clients and others like them to put up signs or hand out notices visible to all clients the minute they walk in the door that not only tell them that the State will pay for them to have an abortion, but also give them a phone number to call to make the arrangements. Talk about stacking the deck!

In support of its erroneous and unconstitutional ruling, the Court relies on the idea that, because our clients’ clinics are licensed by the State, anything and everything that’s said by anybody within the four walls of the clinic about the services they provide can be regulated, shaped and controlled by the government, including the when and how our clients present something as controversial as abortion. And, if they don’t comply, these nonprofit charities, which face a daily struggle to pay the light bills and buy the supplies they hand out for free, can be fined into submission.

Fortunately, the case is far from over. We are already working on a Petition to have the case reheard by the full Ninth Circuit. That Petition will be filed by the end of this month. And if we don’t succeed there, we intend to ask the Supreme Court of the United States to take up the matter and vindicate our clients’ First Amendment rights.

Stop the Shutdown of Pro-Life Centers

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re engaged in a comprehensive legal strategy to defend pro-life pregnancy centers. Stand with us. Have your gift doubled today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

NARAL Sees Life as the Competition

By ACLJ.org1531145560658

Big Abortion is irate because Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers are using technology to steal their business and save babies. According to a recent report , the radical abortion group NARAL Pro-Choice America is livid with search engine Google for allowing pro-life advertisements, resulting in users being...

read more

ACLJ Files Support for Babies with Down Syndrome

By Michelle Terry1530547200000

On Friday, June 29, 2018, the American Center for Law & Justice filed an amicus curiae brief – a “friend of the court” brief – at the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Lance Himes, et al . We filed our brief on behalf of the ACLJ and our Committee to Defend...

read more

Pro-Life Centers Can’t Be Forced to Promote Abortion

By Geoffrey Surtees1530030093744

Today, in a 5-4 decision , the United States Supreme Court held that California cannot conscript pro-life pregnancy centers into mouthing a government-dictated message motivated by that state’s pro-abortion ideology. This is a resounding victory for the First Amendment right to free speech and the...

read more

Planned Parenthood Challenge to Arkansas Law Rejected

By Edward White1529071200000

Recently, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge brought by Planned Parenthood against an Arkansas law requiring abortion pill providers to contract with a physician who has hospital admitting privileges. Planned Parenthood had successfully convinced a trial court to grant an injunction against the...

read more