A few months ago we told you about our lawsuit on behalf of a pro-life nurse in Indiana who was turned down for a faculty position at Indiana University South Bend (“IUSB”). Our client, Cynthia Isabell, was denied a full-time faculty job at IUSB for which she was eminently well-qualified after being grilled in an interview by an Assistant Dean “about being pro-life.”
This happened shortly after Cindy had published an internet blog article about her pro-life views. We’re suing IUSB in federal court in South Bend alleging that IUSB’s agents retaliated against Cindy for expressing her viewpoint in violation of her First Amendment right to free speech. IUSB filed a Motion for Summary Judgment asking the Court to dismiss Cindy’s case on various legal grounds.
We are now happy to report that the Court has denied IUSB’s motion. In a thorough and well-reasoned 27-page opinion issued today, the Hon. Damon R. Leichty rebuffed IUSB’s attempt to have the case thrown out, stating that “this case is for the jury.” The Court noted the abundance of testimony in the record from IUSB’s own employees, faculty members who participated in the hiring process and others, that the process was grossly unfair to Cindy Isabell. Several IUSB faculty members reported that Assistant Dean Dobrzykowski directly questioned Cindy “about being pro-life” with one professor going so far as to file an Affirmative Action complaint about it.
In today’s opinion, Judge Leichty writes, “[T]he question about being ‘pro-life’ was apparently a shot heard around campus as faculty outside the process learned about it and became ‘appalled’; and even more, the subject was discussed within the search and screen committee.” Thus, the Court held that “a reasonable jury could find that Dr. Dobrzykowski was tying together ‘being pro-life’ with the ‘inability to teach’ at Indiana University – an animus deserving no place in hiring decisions at a prestigious state university.”
We couldn’t agree more. Equating “being pro-life” with an “inability to teach” at a state university or any other institution for that matter is indeed an unlawful animus. Actions taken by public officials in furtherance of such animus – whether denying a job or discriminating in the terms or conditions of employment – are against the law.
In Cindy’s case, her rights under the First Amendment are directly implicated. As the Court has now found, the record in Cindy’s case contains more than enough evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude that IUSB’s Assistant Dean harbored an animus against Cindy because of the pro-life views she expressed in her article and that this undermined the legitimacy of the whole process.
With today’s decision, we have been given the green light to prepare the case for trial on April 29th before a jury in South Bend. We look forward to doing just that and to vindicating the First Amendment rights of all citizens, and in particular pro-life citizens, who shouldn’t have to be afraid that “being pro-life” could cost them their careers.
As we aggressively take legal action to protect doctors and nurses from being forced to perform abortions, your gift today could help us save lives.
Planned Parenthood, which deceptively claims that abortions are only an infinitesimal part of its business, just set a record for the most abortions committed in a single year. Planned Parenthood’s 2018-2019 annual report shows that while nationally the abortion rate is at an all-time low , Planned...
For years, the abortion industry and its proponents have insisted that abortion is very safe, even safer than childbirth. One problem: this is a myth, a woefully unsupported myth. Contrary to this myth, abortion – the deliberate interruption of the natural, healthy physical process of pregnancy by...
The ACLJ just filed a new FOIA records demand to help expose the abortion lobby’s lie that abortion is safe and should be a constitutionally protected right. The abortion machine is trying to tear up pro-life laws in our country state by state to extend its grip and “ double down ” on abortion.
As we first told you about here , the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard the case Preterm-Cleveland v. Lance Himes . The American Center for Law & Justice filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the parties asking the Court to overturn the lower court and allow the state of Ohio to...