Federal Appeals Court Upholds Texas Abortion Regulations | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Federal Court Upholds TX Abortion Regs

By Walter M. Weber1433949753013

In a 56-page opinion issued today, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit unanimously upheld Texas abortion laws requiring abortionists to have admitting privileges at a hospital and requiring abortion facilities to meet state safety standards for ambulatory surgical centers. While the court did affirm, in modified form, an injunction as applied to two particular abortion facilities (in El Paso and McAllen), the court rejected abortionists’ challenges to the regulations elsewhere throughout the state. The ACLJ, jointly with the Houston Coalition for Life (HCL), had filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the regulations.

This decision in Whole Women’s Health v. Cole (previously named Whole Women’s Health v. Lakey) reaffirms the principle that the “right to abortion” recognized in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey is not the “right to an unsafe abortion.” As the appeals court emphasized, the Supreme Court has repeatedly underscored that states can protect women from unsafe abortion practices.

This case has the potential to reach the Supreme Court – that is, if the abortionist challengers decide to pursue it further.

The ACLJ/HCL amicus brief confronted pro-abortion verbal engineering, urging the appeals court not to use the latest euphemism of “abortion care,” which masks the destruction of abortion behind the comforting language of “care.” Our brief pointed out that courts are not supposed to weigh in on one side or the other of a marketing campaign. This Court should therefore avoid using the euphemism “abortion care” . . . . Moreover, the phrase “abortion care” is awkward and redundant.  A surgeon does a heart bypass, not “heart bypass care.”  An orthodontist provides braces, not “braces care”.   A technician does a mammogram, not “mammogram care”.  And an abortionist does abortions, not “abortion care.”

Happily, the Fifth Circuit’s opinion did not use the slanted phrase “abortion care.”

The ACLJ/HCL amicus brief also attacked the myth that abortion is safer than childbirth. While this particular issue did not appear anywhere in the court’s opinion, we were happy for the opportunity to educate the court about the true risks of abortion.

The appeal was argued in January, 2015. The decision today starts the clock running for any request for rehearing or for Supreme Court review. In the meantime, these safety measures can help protect Texas women from unscrupulous or incompetent abortion practitioners.

Stop the Pain. Stop Abortions.

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re fighting the abortion industry and defending the unborn in court and in Congress. Defend life with your tax-deductible gift today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Abortion-Related Businesses to “Permanently Close”

By Edward White1513093058281

From Day One , the ACLJ has been aggressively calling for Congress and federal and state law enforcement to investigate Big Abortion for the horrific practice of selling aborted babies’ body parts (fetal tissue) for profit. It’s illegal, but until recently has gone on unhindered from the fear of...

read more

Planned Parenthood Under DOJ Investigation

By Michelle Terry1512764518767

In confirmation of news we brought you not long ago, it has now been verified by multiple news outlets that the Department of Justice is, in fact, investigating Planned Parenthood and its illegal practices, such as profiting from the sale of aborted fetal tissue. The Chairman of the Senate...

read more

ACLJ Files Second Abortion-Pill Mandate Amicus Brief

By Geoffrey Surtees1512748800000

This week, the ACLJ filed a second amicus brief in support of the Administration’s recently issued Interim Final Rules granting religious and moral exemptions to the HHS abortion-pill Mandate. Our first brief was filed last week in the case of Pennsylvania v. Trump . Like Pennsylvania, California...

read more

ACLJ Official Comments About Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1512494683962

When the Obama Administration first sought to coerce religious organizations, family-owned businesses, and non-profit advocacy groups into facilitating the provision of morally objectionable drugs and services (including abortion pills) as part of ObamaCare, the ACLJ took action. In addition to...

read more