Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Delivers Major Victory in Battle To Defund Planned Parenthood | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Court of Appeals for 5th Circuit Delivers Major Victory for Life

By Laura Hernandez1608051477537

In a critical blow to Planned Parenthood’s access to taxpayer funds, the full United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the states of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi could disqualify Planned Parenthood as a medical services provider under Medicaid. This effectively defunds Planned Parenthood from Medicaid dollars in those states.

In Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health Services, Inc. v. Kauffman, the litigation began after the Texas Health and Human Services Commission learned of undercover footage obtained by the Center for Medical Progress — and verified by two forensic reviews — indicating that the abortion organization had broken federal law by profiting from the sale of fetal body parts from aborted babies that were then sold for research. The state removed Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding and several of Planned Parenthood’s patients immediately sued in federal court to challenge the decision.

By way of background, Planned Parenthood gains access to indigent women by providing birth control and preventive services under the Medicaid program. Medicaid payments constitute a significant chunk of the taxpayer funds flowing to the abortion giant. According to a Washington Post article published recently, “about half of Planned Parenthood’s patients are on Medicaid.”  As a Medicaid provider, Planned Parenthood milks Medicaid patients like they are “mini cash cows,” according to former Planned Parenthood manager Ramona Treviño.

Contrary to what the Washington Post implied, however, efforts to cut off the flow of Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood historically have failed in the courts, not in the politically accountable branches of government. Five federal appellate courts have read the Medicaid statute as barring states from disqualifying Planned Parenthood as a Medicaid provider. As we have argued, see here and here, however, the Medicaid statute says no such thing.

Recently the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit agreed that the Medicaid statute could not be interpreted as allowing Planned Parenthood’s patients to sue states for disqualifying Planned Parenthood as a Medicaid provider. And now, the Fifth Circuit, sitting en banc, has joined the Eighth Circuit. The court held that the Medicaid statute does not bar states from disqualifying various Medicaid providers, including Planned Parenthood. “Whether a provider is ‘qualified’ . . . is a matter to be resolved between the State (or the federal government) and the provider.”

The Fifth Circuit’s en banc decision reversed earlier Fifth Circuit panel decisions that had ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood.

Although the Fifth Circuit’s decision is an important victory in the battle to defund Planned Parenthood, it is also significant because it increases the likelihood that the Supreme Court will eventually grant review and finally resolve the disagreement among the Circuits.  As we reported here, the Supreme Court has declined twice within the past two years to hear cases raising identical issues.  In 2018, the Court declined to hear the case over the dissent of three Justices.  With the addition of conservative Justices to the Court over the past two years, it is just a question of time before four Justices will vote to hear a case; and it is quite possible the Court will grant review in this case. The Court often prefers to grant review only after many of the lower federal appellate courts have decided cases on the issue, and there is fairly equal division among them.

Should the Supreme Court agree to hear this case, the ACLJ will be ready, with your help, to continue the fight to defund Planned Parenthood.

Defund Planned Parenthood Now

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re taking on the abortion industry in federal court and fighting in Congress to cut off its taxpayer funds. Support our pro-life work today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

31 Senators Aim to Block Planned Parenthood From More Relief Funds

By Jordan Sekulow1611003643438

Planned Parenthood may be gearing up to make another play for federal relief funds intended for actual small businesses and not a billion-dollar abortion behemoth. This cannot be tolerated. A group of 31 pro-life Senators, led by Sen. Tom Cotton (AR), has taken action to block Planned Parenthood...

read more

Pro-abortion Justice Sotomayor Ironically Uses Pro-Life Talking Points

By Walter M. Weber1610731568758

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has been a reliable pro-abortion vote on the Supreme Court. That didn’t change when she dissented from a recent pro-life victory in abortion-pill litigation. Yet ironically, in her dissent (joined by Justice Elena Kagan), Justice Sotomayor embraced several...

read more

Abortion Is the Leading Cause of Death at Nearly 42% of Deaths

By Jordan Sekulow1610490296014

According to a new report , abortion is now the world’s leading cause of death, accounting for nearly 42% of all deaths worldwide. Let that sink in for a moment. That’s almost HALF. More than cancer. More than heart disease. More than any criminal violence. In 2020, our entire country, and indeed...

read more

Update: Sixth Circuit Rules Tennessee Can Enforce Pro-Life Law

By Michelle Terry1607619187857

Recently, we told you about an amicus brief that the ACLJ filed at the Sixth Circuit in support of pro-life laws protecting children from abortion for discriminatory reasons or in cases where a heartbeat has been found. Those laws had been enjoined from enforcement by a district court; but now, the...

read more