Big Corporations and Big Law Firms Captive to the Pro-Abortion Left | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Corporations Captive to Pro-Abortion Left

By Walter M. Weber1468938308061

One of the biggest myths in popular culture is that big businesses are conservative.  To the contrary, many huge corporations and the biggest law firms have now become huge influencers for progressivism and pressure engines for the political Left, as they have demonstrated in a variety of contexts.

One recent example is the Supreme Court abortion case, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, which involved abortionists' constitutional challenge to two commonsense Texas abortion safety regulations. According to a legal publication, United States Law Week (June 30, 2016, p. 1942),

24 large law firms participated in the case. These are firms that have appeared on Above the Law's 2016 or 2015 Power 100 Law Firm Rankings. All the firms -- including 82 attorneys -- represented the law's challengers [i.e., those attacking the abortion regulations] or amici [friends of the court] supporting the challengers. . . . No large law firm represented Texas or amici supporting Texas.

(Emphasis added.) That's astounding -- and disturbing. Apparently big law culture only tolerates a publicly pro-abortion stance.

The same apparently goes for Big Corporate America. As U.S. Law Week reports (pp. 1940-41):

[A]n amicus brief on behalf of a group of 60 business professionals who opposed the regulations at issue . . . [featured] current or former Fortune 200 executives . . . [including] current and former executives at Microsoft Corp., Google, and Hyatt Hotels [as well as BP America and Nuveen Investments] . . . .

One might have thought that the corporations opposed the Texas law as part of a general corporate antipathy to regulations of any business. That arguably would make some business sense. But no, the rationale in the Brief of Amicus Curiae Business Leaders was more crass: a woman needs ready access to abortion so she can place "her own economic and professional interests as well as those of the business in which she works" above "entry into parenthood."

That's right: abort those babies, the corporations say, so they won't interfere with your office duties. Pretty crass. Not to mention offensive to hard-working women and mothers here at the ACLJ. Maybe the corporate executives should have just said, "Hey, we're pro-abortion and we're powerful, so rule the way we want. We don't need to bother concocting some kind of business excuse."
Of course, killing off future clients and customers through abortion is the opposite of sound business strategy. But apparently Big Law and Big Corporations are willing to sacrifice future economic wellbeing for Leftist ideology.

Don't Murder Babies with Disabilities

Pro Life  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

It’s our sacred duty to defend unborn babies. Every gift - of any amount - could save a life. Have your gift to defend babies DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

NARAL Sees Life as the Competition

By ACLJ.org1531145560658

Big Abortion is irate because Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers are using technology to steal their business and save babies. According to a recent report , the radical abortion group NARAL Pro-Choice America is livid with search engine Google for allowing pro-life advertisements, resulting in users being...

read more

ACLJ Files Support for Babies with Down Syndrome

By Michelle Terry1530547200000

On Friday, June 29, 2018, the American Center for Law & Justice filed an amicus curiae brief – a “friend of the court” brief – at the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Lance Himes, et al . We filed our brief on behalf of the ACLJ and our Committee to Defend...

read more

Pro-Life Centers Can’t Be Forced to Promote Abortion

By Geoffrey Surtees1530030093744

Today, in a 5-4 decision , the United States Supreme Court held that California cannot conscript pro-life pregnancy centers into mouthing a government-dictated message motivated by that state’s pro-abortion ideology. This is a resounding victory for the First Amendment right to free speech and the...

read more

Planned Parenthood Challenge to Arkansas Law Rejected

By Edward White1529071200000

Recently, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge brought by Planned Parenthood against an Arkansas law requiring abortion pill providers to contract with a physician who has hospital admitting privileges. Planned Parenthood had successfully convinced a trial court to grant an injunction against the...

read more