Big Abortion Seeks To Derail Congressional Investigation | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Big Abortion Seeks To Derail Investigation

By ACLJ.org1459436575566

As the special House committee created to investigate the selling of baby body parts begins its inquiries, the committee is confronting lies and misrepresentations peddled by big abortion businesses.

The House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives, chaired by Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn and established pursuant to H. Res. 461, was created in the wake of investigative journalists releasing undercover videos that caught Planned Parenthood officials bartering over aborted baby body parts and bragging about conducting abortions in ways that could maximize their profits.  

And now many of the lucrative abortion businesses and their university partners subpoenaed by the committee are attempting to impede the House Committee’s mandate.  When the Investigative Panel has asked for information about personnel at medical supply companies and other laboratories involved, they have been falsely told that the investigations are endangering peoples’ lives and halting important medical research.

Rep. Blackburn explained:

The Select Investigative Panel is working in a thoughtful and thorough manner to find the facts about what exactly is going on at these abortion businesses and procurement organizations. Unfortunately, some of these organizations have so redacted documents — even after being subpoenaed — that it is impossible for us to get the complete picture of what is actually going on.

These deflections are meant to distract from the real issue – aborted babies who are denied equal human dignity under our nation’s laws are harvested for their human body parts, all in the name of “medical research.” 

The New York Times breaks down one especially disturbing exchangethat highlights the business relationship between abortion clinics and fetal procurement companies:

In an email exchange between a researcher and an abortion clinic technician, the researcher placed an order for a fetus with an intact skull. The technician replied that an abortion then underway could suffice.

“The calvarium is mostly intact, with a tear up the back suture line, but all pieces look to be there,” the technician wrote in an email dated Jan. 22, 2015. “The limbs, one upper and one lower, are totally intact, with one upper broken at the humerus, and one lower broken right above the knee. Please let me know if these are acceptable. I have set them aside and will await your reply.”

“That sounds great,” the researcher replied. “We would like both of them.”

Committee investigators say they have uncovered evidence of possible illegal profiteering, questionable consent forms and inappropriate collusion between scientists seeking fetal tissue and abortion providers.

Not only is this exchange sickening, but it may have criminal implications.  The sale of fetal tissue for profit is prohibited by federal law, and altering abortion techniques to ensure an intact fetus is a serious violation of medical ethics, as well as possibly numerous state and federal laws.

The information being sought by the committee is vital to ensure that those in the abortion industry are held accountable when they illegally and/or unethically sell baby body parts, and to ensure that the rights of mothers are protected from abortionists whose first motivation is profit, not the health and welfare of their patients.   No matter what spin abortion allies put on the House investigation, the work of Chairwoman Blackburn and her committee members protects vulnerable women and children.

It is not the House Committee’s investigation that is putting lives at stake as the abortion industry claims.  Instead, it is the dubious practices of these organizations – as they deceive women and callously desecrate the remains of their aborted children – that truly endanger lives.

Defund Planned Parenthood Now

Pro Life  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re taking on Big Abortion in federal court and fighting in Congress to cut off its taxpayer funds. Support our pro-life work today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Did Your Senator Vote to Make You Pay for Abortions?

By Nathanael Bennett1547843701140

For more than 40 years, the Hyde Amendment has prohibited U.S. tax dollars from directly funding abortions under Medicaid and several other federal programs. Each year, this critical language has been approved as part of the Labor-HHS appropriations process, and has by many accounts been...

read more

JSL: Court Rules Against Planned Parenthood in Texas

By Jordan Sekulow1547841297709

Today is a day where life is being celebrated and defended at the 46th annual March for Life in Washington, D.C, and so it’s fitting that a huge blow has just been dealt to the nation’s largest abortion provider. Today on the show, we told you about a major victory in Texas where a federal appeals...

read more

46th March for Life: We Fight for Life

By Olivia Summers1547823600000

Today, January 18, 2019, is the 46th Annual March for Life, and I along with several others from the ACLJ will be in attendance. Now it is more important than ever to stand for the rights of those unborn babies who can’t defend themselves. As we have explained before , the March for life is the...

read more

ACLJ Submits Comment in Support of Pro-Life HHS Rule

By Olivia Summers1546982585855

Today, the ACLJ submitted its formal public legal comment in support of a new pro-life rule proposed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that strengthens bans on taxpayer funding for abortion and requires insurance companies to inform you – the customer – if their plans cover...

read more