ACLJ Submits Official Comments Supporting HHS’s New Policy of Protecting Life “Beginning at Conception” | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Protecting Life “Beginning at Conception”

By Francis J. Manion1509145200000

The writer G.K. Chesterton once made the following observation:

We shall soon be in a world in which a man may be howled down for saying that two and two make four, in which people will persecute the heresy of calling a tri-angle a three-sided figure, and hang a man for maddening a mob with the news that grass is green.

Well, judging by the furious reaction of the Abortion Lobby to the Department of Health and Human Services' ("HHS") draft Strategic Plan, we are most assuredly now living in the world Chesterton foresaw.

Last month, HHS issued a draft of its Fiscal Years 2018-2022 Strategic Plan and asked for the public's comments. As we previously explained:

This time their plan, for the first time ever, has explicitly recognized that life begins at conception. This is a major victory for the rights and dignity of the unborn.

The HHS plan goes well beyond lip service. It incorporates this scientific principle as an integral and holistic part of its healthcare mission here at home and around the globe. Specifically, the fact that life begins at conception is included in four key components of the plan.

While you would have to look long and hard to find any news stories about any proposed strategic plan of the Grain Inspection, Packers & Stockyards Administration, the Japan-United States Friendship Commission, or any other federal agency, HHS’s simple straightforward recognition that life should be protected "beginning at conception" has elicited a vicious firestorm from the Left.

The Abortion Lobby sent out a call to arms (or, perhaps, a call to social media), labeling this a "radical departure," and "junk science" which would pave for the way for undoing the right to abortion, and urging abortion supporters to "Write, Write, Write!" comments to HHS demanding that the language be removed. We have very little doubt that HHS will soon be inundated with comments obediently parroting the pro-abortion talking points.

We at the ACLJ have also filed Comments on the HHS plan on behalf of tens of thousands of you. We begin by pointing out what should be obvious to anyone who has ever darkened the door of the fourth or fifth grade: life does, in fact, begin at conception. This is not theology. It's biology. No amount of handwringing about "choice" can change that fact.

The scientific support for this fact is so extensive that, in our Comments, we barely scratch the surface of possible scientific citations that could be made. For instance:

  • “[The Zygote] results from the union of an oocyte and a sperm. A zygote is the beginning of a new human being. Human development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm . . . unites with a female gamete or oocyte . . . to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 6th ed. Keith L. Moore, Ph.D. & T.V.N. Persaud, Md. (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1998), pp. 2-18.
  • “Almost all higher animals start their lives from a single cell, the fertilized ovum (zygote) . . .  The time of fertilization represents the starting point in the life history, or ontogeny, of the individual.” Patten’s Foundations of Embryology Bruce M. Carlson, 6th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996), p. 3.
  • “The zygote thus formed represents the beginning of a new life.” Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics J.P. Greenhill and E.A. Friedman (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1974), p. 17.

In addition to restating the scientifically indisputable facts of life, we then point out that, rather than marking any sort of "radical departure" or "anti-science" novelty, HHS's language is consistent with language the Department has been using since at least the Kennedy Administration. One HHS institute, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child and Human Development, started by JFK in 1962 and operating under the National Institutes for Health, states that its purpose is to study the “complex process of human development from conception to old age.”  During the Carter Administration, the Department issued a report on the Status of Children, Youth, and Families that observed that “life is a constantly evolving process that begins with conception and continues until death.” And in 2002, HHS promulgated amendments to the federal SCHIP program – a program designed to assist low-income women and children – that defined "child" as an individual under the age of 19 including the period from conception to birth.” The Abortion Lobby howled then, as they are doing now, but the change became law and thousands of children have benefited from it.

The truth is that the real proponents of "junk science" in all this are those who would allow their pro-abortion ideological commitments blind them to scientific realities that are not in dispute. But just as grass is green, triangles have three sides, and two and two make four, life does, in fact, begin at conception, however much that makes some squirm when pondering the incongruity implicit between that biological fact – which no sane person questions – and our hideous abortion regime.
           
At the ACLJ, we welcome the opportunity to speak this truth, and we support HHS in its efforts to protect the lives of all Americans, "at every stage of life, beginning at conception."

This marks a key moment, as it is now the official policy of the United States that life begins at conception. We look forward to working to support HHS’s new pro-life strategic plan and will be ready to defend the pro-life policies that issue from it when they invariably face challenges in court.

Life Begins at Conception

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we defend unborn babies, we urgently need your Tax-Deductible support. Chip in $5 or more and it will be DOUBLED to defeat the abortion industry. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Flawed Verdict Against Pro-Life Journalists Will Be Appealed

By Jordan Sekulow1575041825062

After a nearly two-month trial, on November 15th, a San Francisco jury ruled against David Daleiden, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), its former board members, including our client, and the investigators in Planned Parenthood v. Center for Medical Progress . This is the case filed by Planned...

read more

JSL: ACLJ Fighting for the Unborn in Court

By Jay Sekulow1574808849336

We at the ACLJ are constantly fighting for the unborn. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed a series of cases we are engaged in, fighting for the unborn and Virginia’s new abortion constitutional amendment. A lot of these cases have huge ramifications but we’re looking at the first case on the...

read more

Supreme Court Review of Life Saving Law We Supported

By Jordan Sekulow1574093985453

This is going to be a major showdown at the Supreme Court against the abortion industry, as the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a big abortion related case – a case we urged the Court to take. Months ago we told you how we filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court of the United States in Gee v.

read more

Beware the “Fake News” on Conscience Rights

By Francis J. Manion1573749691541

You may have seen this past week headlines from a variety of news outlets loudly proclaiming the death of conscience rights: “ Trump’s ‘conscience rule’ for health providers blocked by federal judge .” “ Second federal judge strikes down Trump’s ‘conscience protection’ rule for health care...

read more