ACLJ Secures First Amendment Win as Court Blocks Enactment of New York City Law Targeting Crisis Pregnancy Centers | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

1310581720000

(New York City, NY) - The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) said today it has achieved a major First Amendment victory for pro-life advocates after it convinced a federal district court to block enforcement of New York City's recently adopted ordinance targeting crisis pregnancy centers. A federal judge today blocked enactment of the measure, scheduled to take effect tomorrow, by issuing a preliminary injunction which the ACLJ requested last month after it filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the new ordinance.

"This is a resounding victory underscoring what we have argued all along - this law which forces crisis pregnancy centers to adopt and express views about abortion and contraception that they strongly disagree with is constitutionally flawed," said CeCe Heil, Senior Counsel of the ACLJ. "The court clearly understood that this law punishes pro-life advocates. We're confident that this law will never see the light of day and that the constitutional protections afforded to crisis pregnancy centers will be protected."

In a decision issued today by Judge William H. Pauley in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the court concluded the law violates free speech saying the law's "over-expansiveness is evident from its very language." The court was especially critical of the City's desire to single-out crisis pregnancy centers with the new law.

"Defendants' second argument--that Plaintiffs engage in commercial speech because they are provided an audience to whom they can espouse their beliefs--is particularly offensive to free speech principles," the court declared. "While Defendants apparently regard an assembly of people as an economic commodity, this Court does not. Under such a view, flyers for political rallies, religious literature promoting church attendance, or similar forms of expression would constitute commercial speech merely because they assemble listeners for the speaker."

The opinion states: "This Court will not upend established free speech protections in service of Defendants' overly broad definition of commercial speech." The court added: "Local Law 17's fundamental flaw is that ... permits the Commission to classify a facility as a 'pregnancy services center' based solely on unspecified criteria."

The opinion is posted here.

The ACLJ argued that the new law violates the constitutional rights - including freedom of speech - of the crisis pregnancy centers. The ACLJ also asserted that the law forces the centers to espouse a message they disagree with and interferes with their right to craft a message of their own choosing.

The ordinance requires crisis pregnancy centers to post signs in the lobbies of their counseling centers, add extensive additional written language to their advertising materials, and to provide oral statements during both "in person" and telephonic conversations regarding the services offered by crisis pregnancy centers. The requirements apply only to crisis pregnancy centers and not to abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood.

The ACLJ represents The Evergreen Association (Expectant Mother Care Pregnancy Centers-EMC Frontline Pregnancy Centers) and Life Center of New York (AAA Pregnancy Problems Center) which operate a total of 13 crisis pregnancy centers across New York City.

The suit contends that the ordinance violates the constitutionally protected rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, freedom of the press, and due process of law, guaranteed to Plaintiffs by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the New York Constitution.

The ACLJ lawsuit is posted here.

It remains to be seen whether the City of New York appeals today's decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In the meantime, the case will continue with discovery and, ultimately, consideration of motions already filed to grant a permanent injunction against the City.

The ACLJ is being assisted in the case by Christopher A. Ferrara, New York Litigation Counsel to American Catholic Lawyers Association, who is serving as local counsel.

Similar ordinances were recently struck down as unconstitutional by federal judges in Baltimore and Montgomery County, Maryland.

Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C. The ACLJ is online at www.aclj.org.

Latest in
Pro Life

Planned Parenthood Goes to SCOTUS for $60 Million in Title X Funds

By Matthew Clark1602685844285

Planned Parenthood has reared its ugly head again like in the horror movies where the monster keeps returning. Now it’s demanding that the Supreme Court overturn the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) rule denying it access to millions in Title X funding. We publicly supported President...

read more

The Abortion Industry’s Façade Crumbles Even More

By Olivia Summers1601580406231

Throughout Scripture we find promises that evil deeds committed in secret will be exposed to the light – and we are cautioned not only to have nothing to do with evil deeds, but to expose them . This year, more and more employees of Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and other abortion providers have...

read more

Pres. Trump Protecting Babies Born Alive After Botched Abortions

By Jordan Sekulow1601052120396

In a big victory for life, President Trump just announced he will sign an Executive order protecting babies who manage to survive abortions and ordering doctors to provide them with life-saving medical care. President Trump revealed his latest order to protect defenseless babies in an address to...

read more

ACLJ Files Notice of Appeal To Overturn Flawed Verdict

By Jordan Sekulow1600439507899

Caution: The following article contains graphic information that sensitive readers may find disturbing. Planned Parenthood was exposed in court, the United States Senate, and House of Representatives for its disgusting practices. And yet, in a bizarre twist of justice, a California jury awarded the...

read more