ACLJ Files New Lawsuit in Federal Court to Protect Pro-Life Free Speech | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

ACLJ Files Lawsuit to Protect Pro-Life Free Speech

By Michelle Terry1541170948318

Today the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) filed a lawsuit in federal court in Iowa on behalf of two individuals, Anthony Miano and Nicholas Rolland, challenging a state statute that infringes upon their right to advocate for the lives of the unborn outside of Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics in Iowa.

In response to their religious convictions, our clients have conducted their pro-life outreach outside of abortion clinics for many years. They speak to individuals as they enter and leave the clinics, preach scripture from the Bible, and distribute literature to those who walk by. They are careful to not prevent anyone from passing by on the sidewalk and use no amplification devices to share their messages.

Last year, in response to his outreach activities, Mr. Miano was arrested outside of the Planned Parenthood Iowa City Health Center when an individual inside the Center called the police and claimed Mr. Miano’s pro-life and religious words were causing “distress” to those inside the building. Instead of allowing Mr. Miano to peaceably continue his activities – that are protected under the First Amendment – he was cited for disorderly conduct under Iowa Code § 723.4(2). This law makes it a misdemeanor to make a “loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building which causes unreasonable distress to the occupants thereof.”

In this lawsuit, we are challenging the constitutionality of the Iowa statute as it violates our clients’ rights and the rights of others. The statute is vague: it does not define “loud or raucous noise,” “unreasonable distress,” “vicinity,” or “public building.” In other words, the statute fails to give individuals – our clients and others not included in the lawsuit – notice as to what specific activities are prohibited by the law, and when or where they are prohibited from occurring. Moreover, the determination as to whether a violation of the law has occurred depends wholly upon the reaction of a third party and not on the actions of the individual conducting his free speech activities. As such, a person who does not like a message can claim “unreasonable distress” to silence the message. That is known as a “heckler’s veto,” which is unconstitutional.

Our clients have been threatened numerous times by law enforcement officers that if they continue their free speech and expressive activities outside abortion clinics that they may – and likely will – be cited under this statute again. This has caused our clients to decrease the frequency of their pro-life outreach, thereby chilling their speech and likely the speech of others who want to express their pro-life and religious views on public sidewalks outside Iowa abortion clinics.

At the ACLJ we fight to ensure that the law accords with the Constitution of the United States as written and as applied. Here, the Iowa statute fails on both accounts. We will keep you updated as we work to protect the rights of our clients to advocate for the most vulnerable among us.

Defeat Pro-Abortion Laws & the Abortion Industry

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We're aggressively battling in federal court to defeat the abortion industry & pro-abortion laws. Your gift - of any size - will help save lives.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Did Your Senator Vote For Make You to Pay for Abortions?

By Nathanael Bennett1547843701140

For more than 40 years, the Hyde Amendment has prohibited U.S. tax dollars from directly funding abortions under Medicaid and several other federal programs. Each year, this critical language has been approved as part of the Labor-HHS appropriations process, and has by many accounts been...

read more

JSL: Court Rules Against Planned Parenthood in Texas

By Jordan Sekulow1547841297709

Today is a day where life is being celebrated and defended at the 46th annual March for Life in Washington, D.C, and so it’s fitting that a huge blow has just been dealt to the nation’s largest abortion provider. Today on the show, we told you about a major victory in Texas where a federal appeals...

read more

46th March for Life: We Fight for Life

By Olivia Summers1547823600000

Today, January 18, 2019, is the 46th Annual March for Life, and I along with several others from the ACLJ will be in attendance. Now it is more important than ever to stand for the rights of those unborn babies who can’t defend themselves. As we have explained before , the March for life is the...

read more

ACLJ Submits Comment in Support of Pro-Life HHS Rule

By Olivia Summers1546982585855

Today, the ACLJ submitted its formal public legal comment in support of a new pro-life rule proposed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that strengthens bans on taxpayer funding for abortion and requires insurance companies to inform you – the customer – if their plans cover...

read more