ACLJ Files New Lawsuit in Federal Court to Protect Pro-Life Free Speech | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

ACLJ Files Lawsuit to Protect Pro-Life Free Speech

By Michelle Terry1541170948318

Today the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) filed a lawsuit in federal court in Iowa on behalf of two individuals, Anthony Miano and Nicholas Rolland, challenging a state statute that infringes upon their right to advocate for the lives of the unborn outside of Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics in Iowa.

In response to their religious convictions, our clients have conducted their pro-life outreach outside of abortion clinics for many years. They speak to individuals as they enter and leave the clinics, preach scripture from the Bible, and distribute literature to those who walk by. They are careful to not prevent anyone from passing by on the sidewalk and use no amplification devices to share their messages.

Last year, in response to his outreach activities, Mr. Miano was arrested outside of the Planned Parenthood Iowa City Health Center when an individual inside the Center called the police and claimed Mr. Miano’s pro-life and religious words were causing “distress” to those inside the building. Instead of allowing Mr. Miano to peaceably continue his activities – that are protected under the First Amendment – he was cited for disorderly conduct under Iowa Code § 723.4(2). This law makes it a misdemeanor to make a “loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building which causes unreasonable distress to the occupants thereof.”

In this lawsuit, we are challenging the constitutionality of the Iowa statute as it violates our clients’ rights and the rights of others. The statute is vague: it does not define “loud or raucous noise,” “unreasonable distress,” “vicinity,” or “public building.” In other words, the statute fails to give individuals – our clients and others not included in the lawsuit – notice as to what specific activities are prohibited by the law, and when or where they are prohibited from occurring. Moreover, the determination as to whether a violation of the law has occurred depends wholly upon the reaction of a third party and not on the actions of the individual conducting his free speech activities. As such, a person who does not like a message can claim “unreasonable distress” to silence the message. That is known as a “heckler’s veto,” which is unconstitutional.

Our clients have been threatened numerous times by law enforcement officers that if they continue their free speech and expressive activities outside abortion clinics that they may – and likely will – be cited under this statute again. This has caused our clients to decrease the frequency of their pro-life outreach, thereby chilling their speech and likely the speech of others who want to express their pro-life and religious views on public sidewalks outside Iowa abortion clinics.

At the ACLJ we fight to ensure that the law accords with the Constitution of the United States as written and as applied. Here, the Iowa statute fails on both accounts. We will keep you updated as we work to protect the rights of our clients to advocate for the most vulnerable among us.

Defeat Pro-Abortion Laws and Big Abortion

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We're aggressively battling in federal court to defeat Big Abortion & pro-abortion laws. Your gift - of any size - will be DOUBLED to save lives. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Urging Supreme Court to Protect the Most Defenseless

By Walter M. Weber1542326760000

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the Supreme Court to review an abortion case out of Indiana. The case, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) , involves two provisions of Indiana law that were struck down by the lower...

read more

Piercing Big Abortion’s Shroud of Secrecy

By Erik Zimmerman1541777969588

We have recently joined a motion in an ongoing abortion industry lawsuit asking a federal court to require critical documents concerning Big Abortion’s sale of aborted babies’ body parts to be turned over. In 2015, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released a series of videos that showed senior...

read more

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Deals Blow to Big Abortion

By Olivia Summers1539956957514

Recently, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Louisiana law that “ requires abortion facilities to meet basic health and safety standards .” Specifically, the law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. This is a victory for the lives of unborn babies,

read more

It’s Not About Women or Healthcare, It’s About Money

By Olivia Summers1539700346850

In 1970, New York established itself as the abortion capital of America when it passed the most permissible abortion law in America. To this day, New York is one of the most abortion friendly states in the U.S. In 2014, abortions in the U.S. occurred at a rate of 14.6 abortions per 1,000 women .

read more