ACLJ Fighting Big Abortion in Multiple Federal Courts | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

ACLJ Fighting Big Abortion

By ACLJ.org1461870737880

The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) represents Troy Newman, a former board member of the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), in two critical First Amendment cases involving a journalistic investigation of the abortion industry that uncovered extensive evidence of a willingness to engage in, and actual engagement in, criminal and unethical practices: National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress and Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Center for Medical Progress.

Both cases arise from CMP’s undercover investigative journalism study, the Human Capital Project. The Project has released a number of videos showing abortion industry members discussing illegal and unethical practices.

For example, in publicly released videos, Drs. Deborah Nucatola and Mary Gatter—employed by Planned Parenthood affiliates—expressly state, among other things: (1) a desire to “figure out what others are getting” for fetal tissue (that is, body parts of aborted babies) and joking, after haggling over fetal tissue prices, “I want a Lamborghini”; (2) if Planned Parenthood affiliates involved with the sale of fetal tissue “can do a little better than break even, and do so in a way that seems reasonable, they’re happy to do that”; and (3) in an effort to keep fetal tissue intact so that they can be sold and transferred, some doctors modify their abortion techniques in ways that may constitute an illegal partial-birth abortion.

It is a federal crime to knowingly profit from the sale of fetal tissue or to perform a partial-birth abortion.

From the first release of the videos, the Human Capital Project generated enormous public interest. The videos dominated national headlines for months, and the contents of the videos sparked multiple federal and State investigations.

It is critically important to understand what is at stake in each of these major pro-life cases.

National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress:

The National Abortion Federation(NAF) case was filed soon after the release of the first videos in July 2015. On the day the case was filed, a federal judge in San Francisco, California, issued an emergency injunction preventing the release of any information learned by CMP at NAF conferences.

This past February, the judge issued a preliminary injunction, which extended his emergency injunction until the end of the case, including the gag order to prevent public discussion about what was learned at the NAF conferences.

The ACLJ, along with the attorneys representing the other defendants in the lawsuit, filed a notice of appeal and brought the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Last week, defendants filed our opening brief asking the Ninth Circuit to overturn the preliminary injunction and allow the public to learn what CMP uncovered during its investigation at NAF conferences.

Because of the gag order, defendants were only able to publicly release a redacted (censored) version of the brief, blacking out from public view many pages of information learned at the NAF conferences. The Ninth Circuit will decide whether to make the uncensored brief public.

In the brief, we argue that the trial court’s injunction is erroneous, in particular, because it restricts valid, First Amendment activity and requires the concealment of matters of great public importance.

Because of the significance of this appeal, multiple individuals and groups joined a total of seven “friend-of-the-court” (amicus) briefs seeking the reversal of the preliminary injunction and the lifting of the gag order concerning the information learned during CMP’s journalistic investigation.

Here is what some of the amicus briefs have to say:

Attorneys General from fourteen States point out that the trial court’s injunction interferes with CMP’s ability to communicate with law enforcement. They also note that the injunction sets a bad precedent for future cases since a group that seeks to avoid law enforcement scrutiny can obtain an injunction restricting communications about potential wrongdoing.

A group of Constitutional scholars explain that the preliminary injunction is an unconstitutional prior restraint of free speech that should end now.

And, the Susan B. Anthony List and six Members of the United States House of Representatives refute the claim that the contents of the released CMP videos are inaccurate.

The remaining amicus briefs are available here for your review:  American Catholic Lawyers Association, Inc.; Charlotte Lozier Institute, Justice and Freedom Fund, and Peace Crowell, LLP.

We expect the Ninth Circuit to hold oral argument in this appeal and issue its decision in the coming months.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Center for Medical Progress:

The Planned Parenthood lawsuit was filed earlier this year and also deals with CMP’s investigation of fetal tissue sale.

The complaint alleges fifteen claims in an effort to suppress and punish CMP’s free speech activities in investigating the abortion industry. The ACLJ, along with other defense counsel, filed this week a motion to dismiss each of the fifteen claims on various legal grounds.

The trial court will hold oral argument on the motion and issue its decision soon.

We will continue to keep you posted on these two important cases.

Stop Harvesting Aborted Babies’ Organs

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly Tax-Deductible gift.

We're aggressively battling in Congress and in federal court to defeat the abortion industry. Your gift today – of any amount – could save a life.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from the ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

President Biden’s Proposed Budget Guts Pro-Life Hyde Amendment

By Nathanael Bennett1623761940000

While the debate in America over the issue of abortion remains a deeply divisive one, Americans of all political stripes have consistently found strong agreement on at least this one point: American taxpayers should not be forced to pay for abortions. According to a recent poll , 77% of Americans...

read more

ACLJ Files FOIA After Biden Admin Cites COVID-19 To Allow Abortion Pill To Be Sent Through the U.S. Mail

By Olivia Summers1623681013374

Next time you see your local mail carrier, ask them if they know they might be assisting in abortions. It sounds absurd and will likely throw them for a loop, but thanks to President Biden, any given envelope they’re sliding into a mailbox could contain abortion pills. We just took action to expose...

read more

ACLJ Urges Supreme Court To Take Eugenic Abortion Case

By Walter M. Weber1621519140000

Arkansas has a law that makes it a crime to do an abortion for an invidiously discriminatory reason, namely, because the child in the womb has Down syndrome. At the request of abortion providers, lower federal courts declared the Arkansas law unconstitutional, and the state has requested the U.S.

read more

ACLJ Files Legal Comments Against Biden Admin's Abortion Funding

By Laura Hernandez1621452396788

This has been a pivotal week in the battle to defund Planned Parenthood. The Supreme Court dismissed three cases challenging the Trump Administration’s “Protect Life regulations” defunding millions from Planned Parenthood. At the same time, we filed a new formal public legal comment urging the...

read more