Supreme Court Win Today in Pleasant Grove, 9-0 | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


By Jay Sekulow1308676126000

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States today issued a landmark First Amendment ruling clearing the way for governments to accept permanent monuments of their choosing in public parks.  The decision comes in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, a critical First Amendment case in which the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) represented the Utah city in a challenge to a display of the Ten Commandments in a city park.


This decision represents a resounding victory for government speech, said Jay Sekulow, ACLJ Chief Counsel who presented oral arguments before the Supreme Court on behalf of Pleasant Grove City, UT.  The decision gives government the right to speak for itself and the ability to communicate on behalf of its citizens.  Its a significant decision that clears the way for government to express its views and its history through the selection of monuments including religious monuments and displays.  This decision also puts a bookend on the litigation surrounding the display of the Ten Commandments thats been taking place for years across the country.  The critical question before the Court was, Can a city decide which permanent, unattended monuments, if any, to install on city property?  Without dissent, the Court said Yes.  Were delighted that the Court upheld the important distinction between government speech and private speech.


The ACLJ asked the high court to overturn a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that ordered Pleasant Grove City, UT, to accept and display a monument from a self-described church called Summum because the city displays a Ten Commandments monument donated by the Fraternal Order of Eagles.


In a 9-0 decision announced by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court concluded:  In sum, we hold that the Citys decision to accept certain privately donated monuments while rejecting respondents is best viewed as a form of government speech.  As a result, the Citys decision is not subject to the Free Speech Clause, and the Court of Appeals erred in holding otherwise.  We therefore reverse.


The high court concluded that the government has the right to speak for itself without violating the Constitution.  The Free Speech Clause restricts government regulation of private speech; it does not regulate government speech . . . A government entity has the right to speak for itself . . . . it is not easy to imagine how government could function if it lacked this freedom . . .  A government entity may exercise this same freedom to express its views when it receives assistance from private sources for the purpose of delivering a government-controlled message.


The Courts opinion is located here.


The ACLJ contended that the Tenth Circuit made a serious error confusing government speech with private speech.  In its briefs, the ACLJ argues that a citys selection of which items to display in a park like its selection of decorations for government buildings is government speech, and no private entity can claim a Me too! right of access for its own preferred displays.


The ACLJs written arguments, its opening and reply briefs, are posted online at  To read ACLJ's Summary of the opinion, click here.




A Time to Give Thanks

By Jay Sekulow1574866800000

With so much division and disruption taking place all around us, it’s important to pause – to reflect – a time to give thanks. On October 3, 1789, President George Washington issued the first-ever Thanksgiving Proclamation, declaring November 26, 1789 a day of Thanksgiving. While reading the entire...

read more

‘In God We Trust’ is Under Attack

By Jordan Sekulow1568313180000

Breaking news again . . . our National Motto has come under attack. The National Motto of the United States of America is: “In God We Trust .” Now you may not have even known about that. You may not have even known what our National Motto is as it's not something we often discuss in our country.

read more

Angry Atheists Demand a WWI Memorial Cross be Torn Down

By Jordan Sekulow1568135071329

This is the story of a major victory for our veterans, for those who died serving our country and for religious liberty at the Supreme Court. A few years ago I went to visit the Memorial Cross in Bladensburg, Maryland right outside of Washington, DC. It has the names of the servicemen who died from...

read more

Independence Day 2019: Fighting for Life and Liberty

By Jay Sekulow1562180840316

For many here in the United States, Independence Day means a day off, spending it with family and friends, enjoying good food and nice weather, and a spirit of celebration for the freedoms this country has allowed us to enjoy. At the ACLJ, we continue to fight for the freedom and independence of...

read more