Understanding ObamaCare’s $1 Abortion Surcharge in Three Easy Steps | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Understanding Obama Abortion Surcharge

By David French1332281181000

Earlier today, Jay and I spent most of Jay Sekulow Live! discussing ObamaCare’s new $1 abortion surcharge. It struck us during the conversation that the bureaucratic and legal complexities of ObamaCare were making the issue difficult to understand. So here’s how you can understand the controversy in three easy steps.

Step 1: As most people understand, ObamaCare requires every American to purchase insurance. This requirement – the individual mandate – is the legislation’s most notorious feature and will be the subject of intense argument at the Supreme Court next week. However, the mandate is only the tip of the ObamaCare iceberg.

Step 2: Under the provisions of ObamaCare, the federal government dictates what is and is not insurance acceptable to meet the mandate’s requirements. In other words, the Department of Health and Human Services has very broad rulemaking power to define what insurance will – and will not – cover and the cost of that coverage. This rulemaking power is the source of the now-famous battle over contraception mandates.

Step 3: As part of its rulemaking power, HHS is proposing a $1 abortion surcharge that will require individuals who purchase certain health insurance plans to pay an additional monthly surcharge for abortion coverage. According to early reports, individuals enrolled in those plans would not be able to opt out of the surcharge alone and would only be informed of its existence during enrollment. If you opt out of the surcharge, you would have to opt out of your plan entirely and may not be able to find a suitable replacement.

If all this sounds complex, it is. And if you think it’s a clever gimmick to both compel and deceive millions of Americans into directly subsidizing abortions, you’re right. The Obama administration is one of the most radically pro-abortion administrations in American history. After all, President Obama is the same person who - as a state senator - voted against born-alive infant protection in Illinois, his administration is attempting to force states to fund Planned Parenthood and he’s now using the fine print of ObamaCare to subsidize abortions.

But the battle is not over. Pro-life members of Congress are mobilizing, and you can lend them vital support if you sign our petition today.

Latest in
ObamaCare

ACLJ Files at Supreme Court to Defeat Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1583790229750

Today, the ACLJ filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Trump Administration and their efforts to defend religious employers that object to the abortion-pill mandate. The brief was submitted on behalf of over 463,000 ACLJ...

read more

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear ObamaCare Case for 3rd Time

By Jordan Sekulow1583273806588

This could finally be the death knell for ObamaCare. The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a THIRD major challenge to ObamaCare, aka the Affordable Care Act, after a group of conservative-led states argued that the law is now, at least in part, unconstitutional. As reported by Fox News : The U.S.

read more

JSL: ObamaCare Survival Back at the Supreme Court

By Jordan Sekulow1583189623062

ObamaCare is heading back to the Supreme Court in a case that could be the final blow to the Affordable Care Act. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed ObamaCare heading back to the Supreme Court. With tomorrow being Super Tuesday, we also provided updated analysis on the race for the Democrat...

read more

Court Holds ObamaCare’s Individual Mandate Unconstitutional

By Laura Hernandez1577720533204

Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that ObamaCare’s individual mandate is unconstitutional. As we explained earlier , the individual mandate required millions of Americans to buy and indefinitely maintain health insurance or face annual penalties. The Supreme...

read more