Though Flawed, ObamaCare Stands | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Though Flawed, ObamaCare Stands

By Michelle Terry1435602214218

About a month ago, we discussed five critical failures of the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as ObamaCare. Unfortunately, we now know that the highest Court in the land has determined – again – that this law will stand, despite its many flaws. 

Last Thursday, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in King v. Burwell that individuals who sign up for a health insurance plan through the federal exchange program within ObamaCare, and not just through a state exchange as the plain language of the law provides, can still receive federal subsidies.

The Court, as Justice Antonin Scalia stated in his dissent, “[held] that when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act says ‘Exchange established by the State’ it means ‘Exchange established by the State or the Federal Government.’”

We at the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief in the King case in which we argued that Congress meant what it said – that subsidies are only available to those who enroll in ObamaCare through their state exchanges. The Court ruled differently, however, and now this healthcare law will continue to stand.

The only question that remains is how do we move forward? The President’s healthcare law remains unpopular among many Americans. The legal challenges to stop ObamaCare so far have failed, both through the King v. Burwell case, and National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, in which the Court upheld the law’s individual mandate.

On a positive note, however, let’s remember the substantial victory for the pro-life movement against ObamaCare with the Court’s decision to respect religious liberty rights in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. In fact, we have successfully brought seven of these cases on behalf of pro-life business owners. Additionally, other challenges to the HHS Mandate – otherwise known as the abortion pill mandate – remain in active litigation. These cases are led by religious non-profit groups such as the Little Sisters of the Poor.

Besides any future legal challenges to the law, Congress can overhaul ObamaCare through new legislation. At present, there may be support in Congress to change or repeal the Affordable Care Act, but any attempts to substantially change the law would almost certainly be met with a presidential veto

Therefore, it seems that the only sure way to change the current law is for Americans to elect a President and a Congress that both agree that ObamaCare is bad law and should be repealed and replaced with something that respects the sanctity of life and does not force Americans to choose between buying coverage they do not want or facing a costly penalty. 

We at the ACLJ will continue to fight for freedom and for the unborn, even in spite of this unfavorable decision.

Latest in

Trump Admin Starts to Dismantle ObamaCare

By Harry G. Hutchison1485291594293

On President Trump’s first day in office, the ACLJ has already achieved a significant victory as the President adopts a key ACLJ recommendation aimed at bringing down pro-abortion ObamaCare. As one of his first acts, President Trump issued an Executive order directing the Secretary of Health and...

read more

Seven Steps to Dismantle Obamacare

By Harry G. Hutchison1479228324786

The Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) was enacted with great fanfare and unrivaled deception in 2010 as part of a duplicitous plan to destroy America’s private health care system as we know it. The Speaker of the House at the time, Nancy Pelosi, infamously said in March 2010 that, “we have to pass...

read more

The Obamacare Deception Threatens America

By Harry G. Hutchison1477500715632

Promising to bring costs down and increase access on the one hand, and enacted with enormous fanfare and unequaled deception on the other, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) became law in 2010. This law was perhaps the most ambitious social legislation in...

read more

“Pure Applesauce”

By Matthew Clark1456416575920

One of Justice Scalia’s most memorable moments came in a compelling dissent to one of the recent ObamaCare cases. He cut through the majority opinion’s ambiguous, contorted, and complex legal justification for upholding the “SCOTUScare” exchanges in just two words: “ Pure applesauce. ” Pondering...

read more