More Abortion Distortion in Obamacare | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Abortion Distortion in Obamacare

By Nathanael Bennett1417634863942

From day one, we have warned that the real danger of Obamacare is not in the 2,700 pages of its text (as bad as they are), but in the hundreds of thousands of pages of rules and regulations that would flow out of that text.  This week provides yet another example of that danger, and it is in the form of hidden abortion coverage and funding.

As we have explained before, the Obamacare law contains a scheme in which countless insurance plans sold on the Obamacare exchanges include abortion coverage.  Because these plans are federally subsidized, this scheme is a direct violation of federal law (known as the Hyde Amendment) that prohibits federal dollars be used for abortion.  In an attempt to circumvent this law, an “abortion surcharge” was included in the Obamacare scheme, allegedly setting up a process where the abortion portion of the plans would be billed and charged separately.  But predictably, even this fig leaf was revealed to be a fraud when the original regulations for this provision permitted insurers to disguise the abortion surcharge and collect the entire premium together.

Now comes yet another proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that attempts to further hide and distort the truth about abortion funding in Obamacare.  When printed out, this proposed rule is 324 pages long, and buried on pages 200-202 (Sec. III.H.Part 156.3.g) is additional “guidance” on how insurers should administrate the abortion surcharge.  In fairly brazen fashion, the proposed rule specifically states that insures do not in fact have to collect the abortion surcharge separately or even list it on the monthly bill.  In fact, so long as the existence of this abortion surcharge is listed in the fine print at the time of enrollment, the insurance company may continue collecting this abortion surcharge each and every month without ever listing or itemizing it again.

As if millions of Americans being forced to fund abortion coverage was not bad enough, the result of this rule would be that millions of Americans would fund that abortion coverage without even knowing it.  It is not only a violation of federal law, but also an unconscionable violation of the American People’s trust.

Given the recent disdain for the American People shown by the masterminds of Obamacare, I suppose this sleight of hand is to be expected.  However, the American People are far from stupid and can see this for exactly what it is – nothing but the latest move to keep abortion as a pillar of Obamacare. 

The ACLJ will be filing comments in opposition to this proposed rule.  While the presence of the abortion surcharge is unacceptable on its face, the idea that it will now be even further hidden from the view of those who wish to avoid it is simply beyond the pale.

Stop Deadly Abortions

Pro Life  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re preparing to file a critical brief to defend this pro-life law and the unborn. Double your impact for life with a tax-deductible gift.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in

Court Holds ObamaCare’s Individual Mandate Unconstitutional

By Laura Hernandez1577720533204

Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that ObamaCare’s individual mandate is unconstitutional. As we explained earlier , the individual mandate required millions of Americans to buy and indefinitely maintain health insurance or face annual penalties. The Supreme...

read more

ACLJ Files Supreme Court Brief on the Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1573063448105

As explained in more detail here , the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has imposed a nationwide injunction against federal regulations that provide religious and moral exemptions to complying with the HHS abortion-pill mandate. Today, on behalf of over 415,000 ACLJ supporters , we filed an amicus...

read more

Abortion-Pill Mandate Heads Back to Supreme Court

By Geoffrey Surtees1572550614257

When the HHS abortion-pill mandate went into effect over eight years ago, the ACLJ filed the first lawsuit on behalf of a for-profit business challenging the mandate. We eventually brought suit on behalf of a total of thirty-two individuals and companies challenging the mandate in federal courts...

read more

ACLJ Files Brief Supporting Challenge to ObamaCare

By Laura Hernandez1557865863648

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed an amicus brief in a suit brought by 16 states and two individual plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of ObamaCare’s individual mandate. As you probably remember, the individual mandate required millions of Americans to buy and...

read more