From day one, we have warned that the real danger of Obamacare is not in the 2,700 pages of its text (as bad as they are), but in the hundreds of thousands of pages of rules and regulations that would flow out of that text. This week provides yet another example of that danger, and it is in the form of hidden abortion coverage and funding.
As we have explained before, the Obamacare law contains a scheme in which countless insurance plans sold on the Obamacare exchanges include abortion coverage. Because these plans are federally subsidized, this scheme is a direct violation of federal law (known as the Hyde Amendment) that prohibits federal dollars be used for abortion. In an attempt to circumvent this law, an “abortion surcharge” was included in the Obamacare scheme, allegedly setting up a process where the abortion portion of the plans would be billed and charged separately. But predictably, even this fig leaf was revealed to be a fraud when the original regulations for this provision permitted insurers to disguise the abortion surcharge and collect the entire premium together.
Now comes yet another proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that attempts to further hide and distort the truth about abortion funding in Obamacare. When printed out, this proposed rule is 324 pages long, and buried on pages 200-202 (Sec. III.H.Part 156.3.g) is additional “guidance” on how insurers should administrate the abortion surcharge. In fairly brazen fashion, the proposed rule specifically states that insures do not in fact have to collect the abortion surcharge separately or even list it on the monthly bill. In fact, so long as the existence of this abortion surcharge is listed in the fine print at the time of enrollment, the insurance company may continue collecting this abortion surcharge each and every month without ever listing or itemizing it again.
As if millions of Americans being forced to fund abortion coverage was not bad enough, the result of this rule would be that millions of Americans would fund that abortion coverage without even knowing it. It is not only a violation of federal law, but also an unconscionable violation of the American People’s trust.
Given the recent disdain for the American People shown by the masterminds of Obamacare, I suppose this sleight of hand is to be expected. However, the American People are far from stupid and can see this for exactly what it is – nothing but the latest move to keep abortion as a pillar of Obamacare.
The ACLJ will be filing comments in opposition to this proposed rule. While the presence of the abortion surcharge is unacceptable on its face, the idea that it will now be even further hidden from the view of those who wish to avoid it is simply beyond the pale.
We’re preparing to file a critical brief to defend this pro-life law and the unborn. Double your impact for life with a tax-deductible gift. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. In a 7-2 decision , and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today— once and for all —upheld...
Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of the United States, urging the Court to affirm a Fifth Circuit decision holding the individual mandate unconstitutional. As you probably remember, the individual mandate required millions of...
Today, the ACLJ filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Trump Administration and their efforts to defend religious employers that object to the abortion-pill mandate. The brief was submitted on behalf of over 463,000 ACLJ...
This could finally be the death knell for ObamaCare. The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a THIRD major challenge to ObamaCare, aka the Affordable Care Act, after a group of conservative-led states argued that the law is now, at least in part, unconstitutional. As reported by Fox News : The U.S.