Radio Recap – BREAKING: DOJ Sues John Bolton | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

The Department of Justice is suing former National Security Adviser John Bolton to prevent the publication of classified information.

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we discussed the DOJ’s lawsuit against former National Security Advisor John Bolton. The DOJ is seeking to block the publication of Ambassador John Bolton’s book due to national security issues.

The DOJ’s lawsuit filing said:

This is a civil action by the United States to prevent Defendant John R. Bolton, a former National Security Advisor, from compromising national security by publishing a book containing classified information—in clear breach of agreements he signed as a condition of his employment and as a condition of gaining access to highly classified information and in clear breach of the trust placed within him by the United States Government.

Former National Security Adviser Bolton wants to publish this book on June 23rd and this suit seeks to prevent that. We are not talking about someone writing a book about their experience twenty years after the fact. We’re talking about someone writing a book about being the National Security Adviser and about national security events in a current administration.

My dad, Jay Sekulow, made the following point:

So this is a contemporary report evidently – I have not seen the book – a contemporary account of conversations he had with the President but also a contemporary involvement with what appears to be, at least according to the government, national security information – classified information that cannot be released. Ambassador Bolton has made the determination with his publisher that regardless of that fact, even though it was going through what’s called a pre-review clearance that he was going to go ahead and publish this book on June 23rd whether it was cleared or not. At that point the Department of Justice had no choice but to bring an action to seek the delay of that distribution until the national security information is clarified. I don’t think it’s that complicated of a case. It’s that straight forward.

Now, obviously, anytime you’re dealing with publications and First Amendment activities those are big issues. Here when you’re dealing with national security issues that is the overriding factor. Prior restraints are very hard to get, in other words having something stopped from publication. But the overriding factor here at least appears to be the fact that there’s national security data in here.

ACLJ Senior Counsel Andy Ekonomou gave his analysis when he said:

I’ve read the complaint several times because I wanted to not only get the gist of it but really get into it. The government says in the complaint very clearly, our intent is not to censor the publication or to squelch any First Amendment rights that Ambassador Bolton may have in talking about things but to make sure in a pre-publication review, which is ongoing and which he wants to short circuit, to make sure that top-secret information, sensitive intelligence information that he and maybe only he has gotten is not disseminated to the detriment of the United States. He just decided on his own through his lawyer that it’s just taking too long and forget it, I’m just going to go forward with publication.

He put the government in a corner. It couldn’t do anything else.

The full broadcast is complete with more discussion of the United States v. John R. Bolton by our team.

Watch the full broadcast below.

Defeat the Deep State

National Security  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to expose the shadow government & protect our security, we urgently need your support. Have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

Afghanistan and Iraq: Mission Accomplished?

By Wesley Smith1606170739438

On behalf of the Trump Administration, acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller announced last week a significant withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Iraq. While it is the fulfillment of a promise by President Trump to stop the endless wars in which the United States has been entangled,

read more

Iran: Does the Biden Team Plan To Enable the Enemy?

By Wesley Smith1605719095188

Just when you thought there was great progress for peace in the Middle East, and as Iran is feeling the pinch of sanctions and isolation from the civilized world—enter Team Biden. Amos Hochstein , a senior aide to then-Vice President Biden and one who oversaw energy sanctions for Iran during the...

read more

Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Crucial Border Case

By Jordan Sekulow1603834792342

The Supreme Court will hear a major case related to the Trump Administration’s efforts to secure our southern border with Mexico – a case that the ACLJ has been actively involved in – to defend our nation’s security. As we’ve previously mentioned, we have filed a number of critical briefs in the...

read more

Bringing Peace to Once Warring Neighboring Nations With “Lake Trump”

By Richard A. Grenell, Special Advisor for National Security and Foreign Policy1601066160832

This week, a team of senior U.S. government officials from six federal agencies travelled to Pristina, Kosovo and Belgrade, Serbia, to begin implementing the historic Economic Normalization Agreement signed in Washington, D.C., on September 4th. The delegation’s rank and size was a rare show of...

read more