NY Terrorist Entered the US Through “Random” Immigration Lottery | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Terrorist Entered US Through Immigration Lottery

By ACLJ.org1509563855522

On October 31, 2017 Sayfullo Saipov murdered eight innocents and seriously injured twelve others in New York City in an act of terror. Saipov perpetrated this brutal attack with a rented truck, running down pedestrians before crashing into a school bus. Then, he got out of the truck and witnesses heard him scream “Allahu akbar.” In the truck, Saipov left a note pledging his allegiance to ISIS.

To be clear, Saipov is a radical Islamic terrorist and he did exactly what ISIS has been ordering its jihadist soldiers to do across the globe.

Saipov legally entered the United States from Uzbekistan in 2010 through the Diversity Visa Program (DVP). He has lived in the U.S. as a permanent resident alien for seven years. This program was created in 1990 by the Immigration and Nationality Act, codified in 8 U.S.C. §1153(c).

This DVP program “makes up to 50,000 immigrant visas available annually, drawn from random selection among all entries to individuals who are from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States.” Applicants must have a “clean” criminal record, reside in an eligible country, and have at least a high school equivalent education or spent two of the past five years in an occupation that requires at least two years of experience to perform.

The government has known this DVP “random selection” visa program poses “significant risks to national security” for over a decade. In 2007, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report titled “Fraud Risks Complicate State’s Ability to Manage Diversity Program.” The report unequivocally explains the threat posed by the DVP:

[The State Department’s Inspector General] raised concerns that aliens from designated state sponsors of terrorism are eligible for the DV program. Since 2000, nearly 9,800 aliens from state sponsors of terrorism have received diversity visas. The IG stated that the DV program posed significant risks to national security from hostile intelligence officers, criminals, and terrorists attempting to use the program for entry into the United States as permanent residents. . . .

[A]s we have previously reported, the Department of Homeland Security, terrorism experts, and federal law enforcement officials familiar with immigration fraud believe that some individuals, including terrorists and criminals, could use fraudulent means to enter or remain in the United States.

Tragically, yesterday’s terrorist attack confirms this report’s concerns.

At the ACLJ, we have constantly advocated for strong comprehensive immigration policy that protects our national security. The state of the world in 1990 when this law was enacted is not the same in 2017. In the age of terrorism, “random” should never be a part of our nation’s immigration policy.

At the ACLJ, we are preparing a comprehensive legal strategy to ensure our national security. We are pursuing legal demands, policy proposals, and work through our government affairs office to close the legal loopholes, repeal the open invitation to terrorists, and secure our nation.

End “Random Selection” Visa Invitation to Terror

National Security  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we increase our aggressive advocacy in defense of our national security, we urgently need your Tax-Deductible support. Donate today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

Oral Argument in National Security Proclamation Case

By Edward White1525460400000

Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments concerning the legality of President Trump’s National Security Proclamation . The Proclamation, issued in September, fulfilled the promise of President Trump’s March 6, 2017 National Security Executive Order. The March 6th...

read more

What We Need to Know About Negotiations with North Korea

By Wesley Smith1524153390228

It was revealed this week that CIA Director (and Secretary of State nominee) Mike Pompeo traveled Easter Weekend for personal talks with Kim Jong Un, the leader of North Korea. It was a surprising development, which comes as the United States and North Korea lay the groundwork for direct talks...

read more

National Security Proclamation Nearing Decision

By Edward White1523981064218

The legality of President Trump’s National Security Proclamation will be decided soon by the United States Supreme Court. The Court will hear oral argument on April 25th and should be issuing a decision by the end of June. In February, the American Center for Law and Justice (“ACLJ”) filed an...

read more

The Dangerous and Uncertain World We Live In

By Wesley Smith1521039600000

These are dangerous times, and the threat of war is greater now than at any time since the end of the Cold War, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday. Director Coats and Army Lieutenant General Robert Ashley, Jr., the director of the Defense...

read more