Litigation Over National Security Executive Order Continues | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Litigation Over National Security Executive Order Continues

By Edward White1500496715765

In a further development in the ongoing litigation over President Trump’s National Security Executive Order, the United States Supreme Court today halted a Hawaii federal judge’s order allowing refugees to enter this country who lack a close relationship with an America entity.

Previously, on June 26th, the Supreme Court modified the injunctions imposed by federal trial judges in Hawaii and Maryland against the Executive Order. The Supreme Court’s modification explained that refugees and foreign nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen (countries where demonstrated terrorism concerns exist) who lack a close relationship with a person or entity in this country may not gain entry during the temporary period in which the government considers improvements to the immigration and refugee screening processes.

Soon after the Supreme Court’s June 26th ruling, in an attempt to broaden the category of people who can enter this country, the State of Hawaii filed an emergency motion with the same trial judge who had imposed one of the injunctions. The State asked the judge to clarify the Supreme Court’s ruling before the Executive Order went into effect. The judge declined and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to consider the matter.

After losing at the Ninth Circuit, Hawaii went back to the same trial judge and asked him to modify the injunction. Last week, the judge agreed and broadened the definition of which family members can enter the country. The judge also allowed refugees to enter the country in those cases where the federal government had entered into an agreement with a resettlement agency.

The federal government immediately appealed the judge’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit. In addition, the government filed a motion with the Supreme Court to clarify its June 26th ruling that limited entry into the United States to only those refugees and foreign nationals who have close relationships with a person or entity in this country.

The government also requested that the Supreme Court stay the Hawaii judge’s refugee order. On that point, the government argued that the resettlement agencies typically have no direct contact and no relationship (let alone a close relationship) with the refugee before the refugee enters this country.

Today, the Supreme Court denied the government’s motion for clarification but stayed the Hawaii judge’s order allowing refugees to enter the country without the required close relationship with an American entity. That stay is in effect pending the government’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit. During that time frame, refugees will not be admitted entry to this country without the requisite close relationship with a person or entity in the country.

In the coming months, the Supreme Court will consider the merits of the legal challenges to the National Security Executive Order. The ACLJ plans to file an amicus brief supporting the Order. Join our brief by signing our petition below.

Defend Our National Security from Jihad

National Security  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to protect our national security and Christians, we urgently need your support. Have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

What You Need to Know About the North Korea Agreement

By Wesley Smith1528920513933

The historic five-hour meeting between President Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un ended with a signed agreement between the two leaders. It is not a treaty, as it does not contain any details as to implementation or a way forward in order to bring about the general goals in the signed agreement.

read more

The Complicated Hope of a Deal with North Korea

By Wesley Smith1528212074714

As the planned summit between the United States and North Korea was on, then off, and now on again, President Trump acknowledged that the phased dismantling of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program was a possibility. Many in the media latched onto this as a reversal of the President’s pledge that...

read more

Oral Argument in National Security Proclamation Case

By Edward White1525460400000

Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments concerning the legality of President Trump’s National Security Proclamation . The Proclamation, issued in September, fulfilled the promise of President Trump’s March 6, 2017 National Security Executive Order. The March 6th...

read more

What We Need to Know About Negotiations with North Korea

By Wesley Smith1524153390228

It was revealed this week that CIA Director (and Secretary of State nominee) Mike Pompeo traveled Easter Weekend for personal talks with Kim Jong Un, the leader of North Korea. It was a surprising development, which comes as the United States and North Korea lay the groundwork for direct talks...

read more