Iran: How to Fix a Bad Deal | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Iran: How to Fix a Bad Deal

By Wesley Smith1524855600000

In the first official State Visit of the Trump Administration, French President Emanuel Macron came to Washington for three days.  It was a visit marked by much ceremony as we celebrate our historic relationship with America’s oldest ally.  France has been a friend to the people of the United States since the days preceding the American Revolution.  Part of Macron’s mission was to convince President Trump to keep the U.S. in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran Nuclear Deal.

Macron, in an effort to negotiate with Trump, suggested that rather than withdraw from the JCPOA, the agreement must comprehensively address concerns over Iran’s future ability to obtain nuclear weapons and concerns over increased Iranian military action in the Middle East.  In other words, rather than withdraw from the deal, the JCPOA should be adjusted and expanded to allay the concerns of the United States.

Macron’s plan has four pillars:

  1. Severely curb Iran’s Uranium Enrichment Program until 2025.

    Questions:  What happens after 2025, which is less than seven years away?  And, as importantly, exactly how will the West curb that program?  As the plan stands now, there are no spot inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites allowed except by Iranian inspectors and outside inspectors must give Iran advanced notice before showing up. The JCPOA is ripe for abuse and secret research and development by Iran on nuclear technology.

  2. Ensure longer-term curbs on Iran’s nuclear program beyond 2025.

    If one believes Iran’s rhetoric, there will be no “tweaking” of the Iran Nuclear Deal.  Iran’s Foreign Minister wrote on Twitter that his nation’s compliance with the present agreement is “either all or nothing.”  So, again, the larger question is “How, exactly, will the nations who signed the JCPOA (the Five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany and Iran) get the Iranians to expand the present agreement in order to curb their nuclear program beyond 2025?”

  3. Restrict Iran’s ballistic missile program.

    This idea would be laughable if it were not so serious.  Despite UN restrictions on Iran’s ballistic missile program, it continues to defy those restrictions even now, with impunity!  As recently as April 18th, on Army Day, Iran paraded a new missile that is its most advanced medium-range ballistic missile to date, one capable of striking Israel or any other nation in the region.  It is suspected that Iran is already cooperating with its ally North Korea on advanced missile technology.  We know for certain that North Korean scientists are stationed in Iran, and vice versa.

  4. Contain Iran’s activities in the Middle East, particularly in Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon.

    Again, the question is “How?” 

    Today Iran supports and supplies the Houthi Rebels in Yemen, rebels who regularly fire Iranian missiles into the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.  Iran continues to station its militias in Iraq and is attempting to interfere with upcoming Iraqi elections.  In Lebanon, Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, has one of the largest non-state militaries in the world.  Hezbollah has hundreds of rockets and missiles, including new ones with a more sophisticated guidance system supplied by Iran, in Lebanon and these weapons have one target:  Israel.  In Syria, Iran has stationed its ground and air forces in Syria and plans to keep them there.  Under the so-called “De-confliction Agreement” with the U.S., Turkey and Russia, Iran now has troops stationed along the border with Israel. Iran’s intent is to have a permanent military presence in Syria and prop up the brutal regime of Assad.

Finally, in his speech before a Joint Session of the United States Congress, Macron stated: “Iran shall not possess any nuclear weapons.  Not now, not in five years, not in ten years, never!”  His statement is reminiscent of similar statements made by the United States and its allies about North Korea.  North Korea now has nuclear weapons and the world is trying to figure out what to do about it.

On Tuesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani warned of “severe consequences” for the U.S. should it withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.  Iran’s Foreign Minister Zarif stated that if the U.S. withdraws from the deal, Iran would restart its nuclear weapons program, even if the other nations of the JCPOA stay in the agreement.  More than likely, as North Korea has done before them, Iran is already secretly continuing its research and development of nuclear weapons.  We cannot know for sure, as the inspection program of the JCPOA is so convoluted and weak that it is virtually impossible to know with certainty where Iran is in its quest for nuclear weapons.  Once they have these weapons, the game changes and the options of what to do decrease markedly.

As with many complex geo-political problems, the devil is in the details.  President Macron gave a good speech, full of hope and promise.  The four pillars he presented sound good.  But problems remain because there is no realistic way to achieve these lofty goals short of cancelling the JCPOA, reenacting the strong sanctions against Iran, and returning to the policies that were in place until President Obama committed the U.S. to an agreement that is weak, ill-advised, and unenforceable.

President Trump has an important decision to make by May 12. He must decide whether or not Iran is living up to its commitments in the JCPOA.  If not, the question then becomes, what do we do about it?  Benjamin Netanyahu, who knows that Israel has more to lose in this proposition than anyone else correctly explains our dilemma: “The  deal  has to be either fully fixed or fully nixed.”

Expose and End Obama’s Iran Deal

Middle East  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight the deep state to defeat Obama’s Iran Deal, we urgently need your Tax-Deductible Support. Even $5 makes an impact.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Middle East

POTUS: “[It] Will Be the...End of Iran"

By Jordan Sekulow1558383554037

Just days ago we told you about the State Department’s order to evacuate all non-emergency U.S. government employees from Iraq amid increased tensions with Iran. Now, we’ve seen an example of the “credible threat” Iran poses. Specifically a rocket attack near the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, and...

read more

Radio Recap: Are We on the Brink of War with Iran?

By Jordan Sekulow1557947231110

Of course we all hope we can avoid a dangerous conflict, but amidst growing tensions, including suspected Iranian attacks on four oil vessels in the region, the question has to be asked – is it time to take action against Iran? On today’s broadcast, we discussed the State Department’s order on...

read more

Radio Recap: US Responds to Iranian Threats

By Nathanael Bennett1557430500000

Today on the broadcast, we discussed a number of topics, starting with the U.S. imposing additional sanctions on Iran, and deploying the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln to the region as a precautionary response to Iranian threats against U.S. interests. A year after we told you President Trump had withdrawn...

read more

JSL: Mike Pompeo: “U.S. is Confronting Radical Islam”

By Jay Sekulow1547149147489

If you show weakness in the Middle East, evil thrives. If you show strength, it withdraws. The President and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are reasserting the strength of the United States against terror. On today’s broadcast, we discussed Sec. Pompeo’s speech in Cairo, Egypt yesterday. Sec.

read more