So, it turns out that at least some ISIS supporters believe that our government’s persistent refusal to understand or acknowledge their Islamic roots — instead preferring to rely on standard “legitimate grievances” or “root causes” explanations for jihad — actually grants ISIS a significant tactical advantage.
Writing in The Atlantic, Graeme Wood collected reader reactions to his widely-acclaimed cover story about ISIS’s Islamic theology, and the response from ISIS sympathizers was fascinating. A number of them forwarded his article on social media, and one ISIS supporter ”noted nervously that the guy who wrote it must be spying on their tweets.” Others were “delighted that [he] had taken their ideology seriously and concluded that ISIS is an Islamic group.”
But the most ominous response was the final response, a lengthy e-mail from a self-described ISIS supporter describing the distinct advantage ISIS enjoys over willfully ignorant enemies:
What stands out to me that others don’t seem to discuss much, is how the Islamic State, Osama [bin Laden] and others are operating as if they are reading from a script that was written 1,400 years ago. They not only follow these prophecies, but plan ahead based upon them. One would therefore assume that the enemies of Islam would note this and prepare adequately, but [it’s] almost as if they feel that playing along would mean that they believe in the prophecies too, and so they ignore them and go about things their own way. … [The] enemies of the Muslims may be aware of what the Muslims are planning, but it won’t benefit them at all as they prefer to either keep their heads in the sand, or to fight their imaginary war based upon rational freedom-loving democrats vs. irrational evil terrorist madmen. With this in mind, maybe you can understand to some degree one of the reasons why many Muslims will share your piece. It’s not because we don’t understand what it is saying in terms of how to defeat the Muslims, rather it’s because we know that those in charge will ignore it and screw things up anyway.
Fighting the “imaginary war” — it’s hard to come up with a better description of combat based on politically correct notions of what ISIS wants and what motivates its supporters. We’ve been fighting this ”imaginary war” for a long time, beginning with the Bush-era imaginations of an Iraqi nation ready for a democracy continuing to the Obama-era imaginations of “legitimate grievances” and doomed efforts to ally with the Muslim Brotherhood and other jihadists.
It’s easy to see the appeal of imagining things to be other than they are. After all, the imaginary world of latent democracy and productive appeasement is so much kinder and gentler than the real world of jihad. But jihadists thrive on our imaginings – postponing their day of reckoning, and hastening ours.
This article is crossposted on National Review.
At the ACLJ, we’re raising the alarm about radical Islamic terrorism, naming the enemy. Stand with the ACLJ with your tax-deductible gift.
Your data is secure. Learn More »
It has been said there is a new sheriff in town in the person of President Donald Trump. Significantly, there is also a new general on the global battlefield to defeat ISIS and the broader threat of radical Islamic terror. That man is Secretary of Defense James Mattis. The retired four-star...
The attacks on June 3rd in London are only the latest events in a long and bloody world war. It is a war that is the defining conflict of the twenty-first century. It is a battle for the soul of Western civilization. The enemies in this war are the Islamists , radical Islamic jihadists who are...
It’s one of Europe’s most classic locations – and earlier today, it became the latest target of jihadist terror. Mere days after the latest coordinated terrorist attacks in London and Manchester that left dozens killed and even more injured, a jihadist struck again outside the Notre Dame Cathedral...
Each and every time another dastardly jihadist terrorist attack is inflicted on the world, headlines emerge that the savagery was carried out by a “lone wolf” terrorist. As a lawyer who deals in facts, the absurdity of this concept is beyond the pale. The mountain of evidence that has been amassed...