Israel is Not an ‘Occupying Power’ | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


Israel is Not an ‘Occupying Power’

By David French1342565637000

Over at Commentary, Jonathan Tobin is providing excellent coverage of and commentary on the Levy Report, a report by retired Israel Supreme Court justice Edmund Levy finding — among other things — that in the West Bank “Israel does not meet the criteria of ‘military occupation’ as defined under international law.” While the report has been immediately condemned in all the predictable quarters, it’s important to back up and ask an important question: If Israeli governance of the West Bank is truly an “occupation,” then whose territory is being occupied?

Remember, there has never been a recognized Palestinian state in the West Bank. The Palestinians (and surrounding Arab states) rejected the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine, which would have created separate Palestinian and Jewish states and chose instead to launch the first of several attempts to destroy Israel and initiate a second Jewish genocide. The 1949 armistice didn’t create a Palestinian state in either the West Bank or Gaza. Egypt took control of Gaza, and Jordan took control of the West Bank. Consequently, when Israel defeated the Arab world’s second major genocide attempt in 1967, it took Gaza and the West Bank not from the Palestinians but from Egypt and Jordan. Israel isn’t occupying Jordanian territory, the Palestinians rejected statehood in 1947 (before the outbreak of war), and while Israel can’t make a clean and exclusive claim to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), it’s difficult to claim that Israel is “occupying” land that has not since the end of the colonial era definitively belonged to any state. The best phrase to use is “disputed territory.”

I agree with the Jonathan Tobin that the language of “occupation” has done terrible damage not only to the justice of Israel’s claims but also to the hope for peace itself. Occupations under international law must be temporary and thus the Palestinians begin with the default bargaining position of possessing the entirety of the occupied land. Disputed territory, on the other hand, does not yet definitively belong to any power, and its final status is presumed to be settled through negotiation and compromise. The Palestinians begin every negotiation with most of the world community viewing Israel’s occupation as illegal and with the firm conviction that they are entitled by right to 100 percent of Judea and Samaria and that any post-1949 Jewish presence on their land is unlawful. This is not a recipe for compromise, even if Palestinians were predisposed to anything other than the destruction of Israel.

There’s been much talk of “reset buttons” in international affairs. I propose a reset button on the language of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  

This article is crossposted at National Review Online.

Latest in

Federal Court Throws Out Lawsuit Seeking To Delegitimize Israel

By Mark Goldfeder1615474740000

One year ago, on February 25, 2020, a group of Palestinian activists – including those with ties to terrorists – in Washington, D.C., filed a massive lawsuit against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former President Donald Trump, and several other prominent pro-Israel politicians and...

read more

Is Biden Administration Planning on Violating the Taylor Force Act?

By Mike Pompeo, Sander Gerber, and Stuart Force1615390165113

The Biden Administration has signaled its desire to resume aid to the Palestinian Authority (PA) as a way to jumpstart the moribund Israeli-Palestinian “peace process.” The obstacle to peace, however, is not the absence of U.S. assistance but the PA’s incentivizing of terrorism. The bipartisan...

read more

International Criminal Court Targets Israel in Investigation (Recap)

By Jay Sekulow1614897017723

Breaking News: The International Criminal Court (ICC) targets Israel in a new investigation. Today on Sekulow , we discussed the ICC’s targeting of Israel. ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has announced that she is beginning an investigation into Israel for potential war crimes. The ICC has flirted...

read more

The ICC Does It Again, and It’s Not Pretty

By Skip Ash1613746440000

As we’ve pointed out before concerning the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its chief Prosecutor, both are highly susceptible to politics—often at the expense of “law” and the “rule of law” internationally. That happened again on Friday, February 5, 2021, when judges of Pre-Trial Chamber I of...

read more