Here We Go Again: Attacking “In God We Trust” Over Hurt Feelings | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Attacking In God We Trust Over Hurt Feelings

By David French1363794958000

Once again an atheist organization is attacking our national motto – this time suing to have it removed from our currency.

Let’s be crystal clear: This is a lawsuit about hurt feelings, not violated rights.  For two generations, atheist plaintiffs have been permitted to maintain (and sometimes win) lawsuits not because public religious acknowledgments compel them to participate in religious activities or compel belief or compel speech but instead because public religious acknowledgments are “offensive.”

No other basis for the lawsuit makes sense.  The coins – despite plaintiffs’ claims – are not “discriminatory.”  After all, a quarter is a quarter, no matter the faith of the person spending it.  Nor does money compel proselytization.  No reasonable human being believes that paying for groceries means that I endorse the life and beliefs of the President on the currency or the words on the coins.

Plaintiffs are suing simply because they don’t like this democratic nation’s chosen motto, and it’s high time that our nation’s courts shut their doors for lawsuits based on hurt feelings.  In a democracy there is no such thing as universal consensus.  Every act has its supporters and its opponents, and all legislation leaves someone feeling hurt and excluded.  The Constitution exists to prevent the actions of the majority from coercively depriving citizens of protected rights.  Censorship is coercion.  An unreasonable search is coercion.  The taking of property without proper payment is coercion. 

Feeling upset is not coercion. 

Moreover, there’s a remedy for their hurt feelings, and it’s the same remedy that the rest of us have when laws exit that we don’t like: We can exercise our First Amendment-protected right of free speech to seek to change the law.  I invite the Freedom From Religion Foundation to try; it would lead to a welcome debate on the historical role of faith in our founding and our culture.

At the ACLJ, we’ll be filing a legal brief on behalf of Members of Congress and on behalf of everyone who joins our Committee to Protect the National Motto.  We’ll be demonstrating the solid constitutional reasons for upholding the presence of the motto, and – critically – we’ll be giving you a direct voice in an important constitutional case. 

Oh, and we’ll be responding with facts and law, not with feelings.  Our feelings matter, but not in federal court. 

Remembering Those Who Have Died

By Wesley Smith1495807042728

“We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.” ---Winston Churchill Memorial Day is a federal holiday in the United States to remember all those who have died in military service to the nation. The holiday originated in the...

read more

ACLJ Defends Legislative Prayer

By Edward White1494338952909

As many legislative bodies do, the Jackson County, Michigan, Board of Commissioners starts its meetings with a prayer. The American Center for Law and Justice (“ACLJ”) has filed an amicus curiae (“friend-of-the-court”) brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit supporting...

read more

ACLJ Defends School Board Opening in Prayer

By Geoffrey Surtees1493836082751

Can a public school board offer a prayer or invocation prior to a meeting of the board? As we argue in a brief filed with the Ninth Circuit today, the answer to that question is yes . In 2014, the Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education adopted a resolution permitting local...

read more

Latest Atheists' Attack on National Motto

By Laura Hernandez1487279631749

Litigious atheists never give up – at least when it comes to continuing their failing, but relentless, crusade against our National Motto – “In God We Trust.” Appealing their latest defeat to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the atheists, represented by Michael Newdow, challenged the...

read more