It may come as no surprise, but it’s no less outrageous.
President Obama’s Justice Department has officially refused to prosecute former top IRS official Lois Lerner for contempt of Congress.
It is troubling but not surprising that the Justice Department will not seek criminal contempt charges against Lerner.
This latest development reflects what has become standard operating procedure for the Obama Administration in its so-called investigation of this unlawful targeting scheme by the IRS. One year ago, the Justice Department refused to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the unconstitutional actions of Lerner and others at the IRS.
Now, by refusing to pursue criminal contempt charges against Lerner - who proclaimed her innocence before a Congressional panel and then later refused to answer questions citing her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself - the Justice Department is making a mockery of our criminal justice system. This is just one more example of an administration that refuses to hold anyone accountable for a scheme that unlawfully targeted conservative groups.
In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, U.S. Attorney Ronald Machen said he would not bring a criminal case to a grand jury over Lerner’s refusal to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Lerner proclaimed her innocence at a House hearing in May 2013 before invoking her Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate herself. Almost a year ago, the House of Representatives formally voted to hold Lerner in contempt of Congress, recommending that she face criminal charges.
However, Machen said DOJ lawyers determined that Lerner “did not waive her Fifth Amendment right by making an opening statement…”
In March 2014, the Justice Department declined to appoint a special prosecutor, concluding the case doesn’t present a conflict of interest or “other extraordinary circumstances.”
But in February 2015, the IRS Inspector General acknowledged that a criminal investigation is now underway into Lerner’s emails. In testimony before the House Oversight Committee, Deputy Inspector General Timothy P. Camus said “there is potential criminal activity” after discovering hundreds of back-up tapes that could include more of Lerner’s emails that were reported missing. The back-up tapes, according to Camus, were retrieved in early February 2015 after the IRS chief told Congress that they were irretrievably destroyed.
It’s clear that the IRS is institutionally incapable of self-correction. And it's also clear that the Obama Administration is incapable of investigating its own wrongdoing. We will continue fighting in court to ensure that justice is served.
In our federal lawsuit, the ACLJ originally represented 41 targeted conservative and pro-life groups in 22 states. Three of those organizations have now decided to end their involvement in the case because of the lengthy appeals process. Of the 38 groups remaining, 29 organizations received tax-exempt status after lengthy delays, 2 are still pending, and 7 withdrew applications because of frustration with the IRS process.
As our lawsuit continues, take action with us and demand a truly independent investigation – a Special Counsel – to hold those responsible for illegally targeting Americans for their political beliefs accountable. Sign our petition below.
We're taking on the unlimited resources of the Obama Admin. in federal court to hold the abusive IRS accountable. Have your gift doubled. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is going to subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey over censorship. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed the Senate Judiciary Committee announcing its intentions to subpoena the Twitter CEO over censorship of conservatives and even the press and to hold a hearing next...
The Johnson Amendment is the controversial provision in the U.S. tax code that prohibits all 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations from participating or intervening in “any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” As it relates to churches and other...
On May 28th, 2020 President Donald Trump released his Executive Order (“EO”) titled, “Preventing Online Censorship.” In releasing the full text of the EO, mainstream media outlets like NBC news were quick to criticize the Presidential order, characterizing it as just a “response to Twitter,” which...
Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief in two related cases, Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP) v. Becerra and Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) v. Becerra. Both cases began in California when the Attorney General required all charities to submit lists of...