Not a Smidgen of Corruption? Lerner Calls Conservatives Obscenity, “TeRrorists” | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Not a Smidgen of Corruption?

By Jay Sekulow1406750411000

In the midst of my testimony this morning before the House Judiciary Committee, where the Left continued the tired line that there is no corruption and no scandal at the IRS, a series of new bombshell emails were released from Lois Lerner.

Lerner – the senior IRS official at the center of the IRS targeting scandal, the person in charge of the division that was supposed to grant tax-exempt status on a non-partisan basis – emailed a friend in the days following the 2012 election calling conservatives “a**holes.”  Her email chain, using her official IRS email account to rant against conservative Americans, continued, “So we don't need to worry about alien teRrorists [yes, that is her spelling]. It's our own crazies that will take us down.”

That’s right, Lerner was calling conservatives an obscenity and “teRrorists” with a capital “R” via her official, taxpayer funded, government email account.

As I explained in my testimony, the IRS is incapable of self-correction, and the Department of Justice is incapable of investigating itself.  It’s compromised.

The “investigation” is being run by a nearly maxed out Obama donor, the FBI has leaked to the press that the investigation is essentially over, and worst of all, the DOJ itself has been caught red-handed colluding to “piece together” criminal prosecutions against the same conservatives who were being targeted by the IRS.  Not only that, but they were working hand in hand with Lerner as she displayed a reprehensible bias against conservatives, using her official capacity as a government official.

Sadly, when the new email was presented in today’s hearing, the Left side of the dais did not change their tone.

Despite the Left’s attempts to ignore and belittle those Americans who were targeted by their government, I made it clear to Congress that the American people deserve answers.  We deserve justice.  Attorney General Holder should exercise his authority to appoint a Special Counsel – a truly independent investigator – to restore the trust of the American people and get to the bottom of this scandal.

Regardless, at the ACLJ, we will continue to pursue justice for conservative and pro-life Americans who where targeted for their beliefs through our lawsuit against the IRS on behalf of 41 targeted groups from 22 states.

We will not back down.  We will continue fighting to hold those responsible for this targeting accountable and ensure that it never happens again.

Latest in
Free Speech

Leftist Doxing of Conservatives and the First Amendment

By Laura Hernandez1570115343105

Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief in two related cases, Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP) v. Becerra and Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) v. Becerra. Both cases began in California when the Attorney General required all charities to submit lists of...

read more

ACLJ Cues Up Free Speech Case for Supreme Court

By Walter M. Weber1534795413681

Today the ACLJ filed a reply in support of our request that the Supreme Court hear an important free speech case, Keister v. Bell . At stake in the case is the freedom of people to speak on sidewalks along public streets. I wrote about this case when we filed our petition in early July. Since then,

read more

A Blow to Big Labor & A Win For Free Speech

By ACLJ.org1530801653531

For decades public sector employees have been forced to subsidize public sector unions and their political and ideological agenda. No more. In a major victory for free speech and free association, the Supreme Court has just struck down requirements that force public sector employees to pay fees to...

read more

ACLJ Petitions Supreme Court in Free Speech Case

By Walter M. Weber1530558422160

The ACLJ today filed a request that the Supreme Court hear an important free speech case, Keister v. Bell . At stake in the case is the freedom of people to speak on sidewalks along public streets. "What?" you say. "I thought Americans already had the right to speak freely on public sidewalks." So...

read more