IRS Targeting Scheme: "Willful Act of Intimidation" | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Congress told IRS scheme 'willful act of intimidation'

By Jay Sekulow1370376234000

The House Ways and Means Committee today heard from some of the victims in the IRS scandal. Four of our clients testified before the Committee telling lawmakers first-hand about the abuse and harassment they received from the IRS - simply because of their ideological beliefs.

Here's the list of the four clients who shared their stories with the Committee today.

  • Kevin Kookogey of Linchpins of Liberty from Tennessee
  • Diane Belsom of the Laurens County Tea Party in South Carolina
  • Becky Gerritson of the Wetumpka Tea Party from Alabama
  • Karen Kenney with the San Fernando Valley Patriots in California

We represent these four groups, along with 21 other organizations, in our federal lawsuit against the IRS. As we actively work to hold those responsible inside the IRS and the Obama Administration accountable, it's important to put today's hearing into perspective.

All of the testimony today was powerful. And it put the focus squarely on the abusive practices that, by the way, are still ongoing at the IRS.

Becky Gerritson of the Wetumpka Tea Party in Alabama told the legislators that her group was singled out by the IRS for one reason - because the words "Tea Party" are part of group's name. As she put it, "This was not an accident, this was a willful act of intimidation."

She is absolutely correct.

When you hear from people like Becky, you realize the intimidation factor by the IRS is incredible.

As I told Megyn Kelly on FOX News today, we have the evidence - the correspondence from the tax lawyers - including letters from Lois Lerner, the Director of the Exempt Organizations division. Letters that show a coordinated effort to unlawfully target these groups. Not a couple of rogue agents out of an Ohio office, as the IRS continues to assert.

We are in federal court. And it will be interesting to see how the federal government responds to our lawsuit. Will the government deny the charges in our lawsuit - charges that they orchestrated this targeting scheme? Or will the government admit it?  After all, Lerner herself confessed publicly to this scheme in early May after she planted a question at an American Bar Association meeting.

We will continue to get to the bottom of this IRS scheme. We will not rest until this abusive conduct is stopped and those responsible for this campaign of intimidation are held accountable.

Jay Sekulow

 

Latest in
Free Speech

The FCC’s Net Neutrality Regulations Must Go

By Colby M. May1487192382522

After eight years of battling the Obama Administration’s regulatory abuse at the FCC, we are excited about the new chairman appointed by the Trump White House being poised and ready to bring regulatory reforms that we’ve been championing at the ACLJ for years. Earlier this week, The Hill ran a...

read more

Trademarks and Free Speech at the Supreme Court

By Walter M. Weber1484842601399

Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a trademark case, Lee v. Tam . You may be asking yourself, why does the American Center for Law and Justice care about trademark law? In this case, we most certainly do: at issue is the ability of government to supervise – and penalize –

read more

Continuing the Fight against IRS Corruption

By Jay Sekulow1478889386969

As we continue our fight at the ACLJ against the lawless, unconstitutional Obama Administration’s IRS targeting of grassroots conservatives, we are achieving important victories. But the fight also continues in federal court to ensure justice for all 38 of our clients from 22 states across the...

read more

Judge Clears Obama's Internet Giveaway

By ACLJ.org1475520521174

Late Friday, just hours before the deadline, a federal judge ruled against four states that are challenging President Obama’s long-planned giveaway of control over key aspects of the Internet. After Congress failed to take any action to block the transfer last week, four states (Arizona, Texas,

read more