The Washington Times has just reported a key development in the battle against IRS censorship. The IRS may be backing down:
The IRS said Wednesday its new proposal to crack down on tea party and other nonprofit groups won’t be ready before the November elections — even as House Republicans voted to halt the entire process for the next year, arguing the tax agency hasn’t even learned the lessons of its previous problems.
John Koskinen, the new IRS commissioner, said he’s not even sure there will be an eventual rule cracking down on political activity. The agency is trying to write one, but its initial suggestions have drawn tens of thousands of angry comments, and he said they have many other steps to do — including a public hearing and possibly another round of public comment — before they would impose new rules.
The Obama Administration, still recovering from its black eye over its thwarted plan to put FCC monitors in newsrooms, is now backtracking ever-so-slightly on its plan to use the IRS to crack down on free speech.
The partial victory also presents us with a test. One suspects the IRS has not so much had a change of heart as its delaying implementation until America’s attention is focused elsewhere.
But we’re maintaining our vigilance. The ACLJ has filed its own opposition to the new IRS regulations, we’re suing the IRS in federal court, and we’re mobilizing tens of thousands of our members to speak out.
In other words, if the IRS thinks time will cause us to lose our focus, it is sadly mistaken. The First Amendment is at stake.
On May 28th, 2020 President Donald Trump released his Executive Order (“EO”) titled, “Preventing Online Censorship.” In releasing the full text of the EO, mainstream media outlets like NBC news were quick to criticize the Presidential order, characterizing it as just a “response to Twitter,” which...
Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief in two related cases, Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP) v. Becerra and Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) v. Becerra. Both cases began in California when the Attorney General required all charities to submit lists of...
Today the ACLJ filed a reply in support of our request that the Supreme Court hear an important free speech case, Keister v. Bell . At stake in the case is the freedom of people to speak on sidewalks along public streets. I wrote about this case when we filed our petition in early July. Since then,
For decades public sector employees have been forced to subsidize public sector unions and their political and ideological agenda. No more. In a major victory for free speech and free association, the Supreme Court has just struck down requirements that force public sector employees to pay fees to...