The Supreme Court has rejected Texas’ election lawsuit. What happens next?
On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, we discussed the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of the Texas election lawsuit and what that means for the remaining election challenges?
In their rejection, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a very short order. Eighteen states had sided with Texas as well as 126 members of the U.S. House of Representatives. Twenty states, plus two territories, ended up on the side of the four states that Texas sued. Two other states filed briefs saying that this case needed to be heard. In the end, in came down to two short paragraphs from the U.S. Supreme Court rejecting the case for lack of standing.
Here’s what the order said:
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
As I said on the broadcast, I think part of the reasoning from the Supreme Court, even the conservative Justices, was that they simply didn’t need to do this. The state legislatures already had the ability to take care of the remedy themselves. They could have thrown out all the electors if they wanted to. That’s a legal ability that state legislatures have from the U.S. Constitution. It didn’t require the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in for them to use that power.
The key date now is January 6th, where Congress meets to certify the Electoral College results. There are a number of options that can be attempted on that day, including a challenge to the delegations. We’ll keep an eye on how that may develop and keep you informed.
We at the ACLJ are also in the middle of our critical Matching Challenge month. The Matching Challenge means that every donation is doubled. $5 becomes $10. $10 becomes $20. As 2020 winds down, we are already gearing up for 2021. The important work of the ACLJ is going to be even more in important next year. We need your help to continue our work defending the unborn, fighting for religious liberty, exposing the Deep State, and defending the Constitution. Please join us in the fight for liberty and donate today.
The full broadcast is complete with much more discussion by our team of the Supreme Court’s rejection of the Texas election lawsuit, the state of other election legal challenges, and where things go from here.
Watch the full broadcast below.
As you vote, our legal team is preparing to defend the Constitution and the integrity of elections. Have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
After Texas Democrats fled from the Texas State legislature and abdicated their legal responsibilities to Texans, they boarded private planes well stocked with beer to fundraise money off their less-than-courageous escape. Then, despite their cowardice, the Texas Senate in a party-line vote passed...
The Department of Justice is suing the State of Georgia over a new voting law – SB 202. After several key races in Georgia had cast doubt for voters, Georgia lawmakers crafted an election bill that revised their former election laws to ensure fair and secure elections. The Left is claiming that...
Last night, the sweeping voting rights bill known as the “For the People Act (H.R. 1 in the House and S. 1 in the Senate) was blocked in the Senate . The Left is starting to realize the radical shift that they aimed to accomplish with gaining a different makeup of Congress – may not be as easy as...
Today, the Senate is going to vote on an immensely dangerous piece of proposed legislation that would jeopardize the integrity of our elections. We’ve told you what the “For the People Act” (H.R. 1 in the House and S. 1 in the Senate) entails and the consequences that would come with it. Even with...