Victory: Atheist Attacks against National Motto Dismissed in Federal Court | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Atheist Attacks Dismissed in Federal Court

By Laura Hernandez1480620102838

An Ohio federal district court yesterday dismissed Michael Newdow’s lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Motto.  As we previously noted, atheists, represented by Michael Newdow, argued that the mere presence of the National Motto on currency violates their Free Speech and Free Exercise Clause Rights.  Plaintiffs asserted that carrying currency equated to governmental compulsion to speak in support of the National Motto and to bear a “religiously offensive” message, in violation of the Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

With your support, we filed a critical amicus brief on behalf of 50 Members of Congress, and the Committee to Protect the National Motto, which consisted of over 120,000 ACLJ members, urging the court to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ lawsuit. We argued that “while the First Amendment affords atheists complete freedom to disbelieve, it does not compel the federal judiciary to redact the national motto from the Nation’s currency.”

We also explained to the court that “Plaintiffs’ quarrel is essentially with a foundational principle of America,” and “the national motto simply echoes the principle found in the Declaration of Independence that our freedoms come from God and not the state.” Our brief argues further that neither the free speech rights nor the free exercise rights of atheists are impaired by seeing the National Motto on the currency. Placing the National Motto on currency does not force atheists to do anything. The National Motto is the government’s message and no one would attribute that message to atheists or to any other person who happens to carry money.

The Ohio federal court agreed and dismissed Newdow’s lawsuit. In a very brief opinion that stands as an implicit rebuke to the frivolity of Plaintiffs’ claims, the court ruled that the National Motto burdened neither the Plaintiffs’ free exercise nor free speech clause rights because plaintiffs were not compelled to do anything:

“No reasonable viewer would think a person handling money does so to spread its religious message. A person does not own the bills and coins printed by the United States Treasury. The government does not require citizens to display money. Money does not exist for the express purpose that it be observed and read by the public.”

Joining in our brief were Members of Congress, J. Randy Forbes, Senator James Lankford, Senator Roy Blunt, Senator Steve Daines, Senator Jerry Moran, Robert Aderholt, Lou Barletta, Rob Bishop, Diane Black, Doug Collins, K. Michael Conaway, Kevin Cramer, Jeff Duncan, John Fleming, Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Bob Goodlatte, Garret Graves, H. Morgan Griffith, Glenn Grothman, Gregg Harper, Vicky Hartzler, Jody Hice, Richard Hudson, Tim Huelskamp, Randy Hultgren, Bill Johnson, Sam Johnson, Walter Jones, Doug LaMalfa, Doug Lamborn, Robert Latta, Barry Loudermilk, Blaine Luetkemeyer, Tom McClintock, Jeff Miller, Randy Neugebauer, Dan Newhouse, Steven Palazzo, Steve Pearce, Robert Pittenger, Joe Pitts, Tom Price, John Ratcliffe, Peter Roskam, Pete Sessions, Michael R. Turner, Tim Walberg, Mark Walker, and Daniel Webster.

Mr. Newdow and his clients have so far enjoyed a perfect losing streak in federal court challenges to the National Motto, but they remain undeterred. The very same day that the court’s decision came down, Mr. Newdow filed papers notifying the court that he was appealing the decision to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

With your invaluable support, the ACLJ will also remain undeterred in ensuring that Mr. Newdow’s perfect loss record continues. We are already preparing to file an amicus brief with the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Defend “In God We Trust”

Constitution  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re aggressively defending “In God We Trust” - our National Motto - from attack. We can win.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Constitution

Radio Recap: AG Barr Testifies Before the Senate

By Jay Sekulow1556741722090

“A fairly anemic effort.” That’s what Attorney General called the counterintelligence investigation against the threat of Russian collusion in the 2016 Presidential campaign. On today’s show, we discussed Attorney General Bill Barr’s testimony before the U.S. Senate regarding his summary of the...

read more

Will SCOTUS Allow Citizenship Question on Census?

By Jay Sekulow1556137658938

Yesterday we told you how a question intended to be included on the upcoming 2020 census has been taken before the Supreme Court by critics who say it is offensive because it asks if everyone living in your home is “a citizen of the United States.” On today’s show, we asked whether the Supreme...

read more

JSL: BREAKING NEWS: Mueller Report Released

By Jordan Sekulow1555616480579

After a nearly two year investigation, involving 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, and a summary by Attorney General Bill Barr stating there was no collusion or obstruction, the Mueller report has been released. Today on the broadcast, we discussed the release of the Mueller report regarding Russian...

read more

JSL: Just Two Months Away from First Democrat Debate

By Jordan Sekulow1555443010634

It‘s actually shocking, but we are just over two months away from the first Democrat Presidential debate. The first Democrat Primary debates will be held over two nights on June 26-27 in Miami. On today’s broadcast, we discussed the Democrat candidates so far and provided analysis of who looks like...

read more