The States’ Power to Postpone Presidential Primaries | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


The States’ Power to Postpone Presidential Primaries

By Harry G. Hutchison1584629654682

Given the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many states and localities are taking aggressive measures to combat the spread of the virus. In addition to measures banning large gatherings (we discussed the constitutional implications for churches here), a number of states and territories have postponed or delayed their presidential primaries in an effort to ensure social distancing.

While the Democratic National Committee has asked states not to postpone their primaries, the number of primary postponements are growing and include Maryland, Kentucky, Puerto Rico, Georgia, Louisiana, and Wyoming. The decision to delay primaries follows a National Emergency Declaration by President Trump, which has now been followed by state emergency declarations.

State emergency declarations often unlock sweeping powers, which would otherwise be unavailable to the executive branch of a state government. Some states such as Virginia, for example, have specific statutory code provisions, which permit presidential primary voting delays when there has been a federal or state declaration of an emergency.

On the other hand, states, which have authority to postpone state presidential primaries, do not have the right to reschedule or postpone federal elections according to a 2004 Congressional Research Services report. Accordingly, the “date of the general election is set by federal law and has been fixed since 1845. It would take a change in federal law to move that date. That would mean legislation enacted by Congress, signed by the President and subject to challenge in the courts.”

In summary, states, pursuant to either their inherent authority or as provided by statute, have emergency power to postpone presidential primaries. On the other hand, they have no role governing the date of general federal elections for President or Congress.

The ACLJ will continue to aggressively monitor this situation. If you believe that your voting rights have been violated please contact us at That is what we are here for.

Latest in

Elite Scholars Embrace Hearsay, Thwart the Will of the People

By Harry G. Hutchison1575565156640

Yesterday, hardworking Americans who are often highly disdained by the global elites who populate leading academic centers, were treated to a lecture by four legal scholars. As a former law professor of advanced constitutional law, allow me to share my perspective on yesterday’s events. While it is...

read more

Inquiry Rules: Surrender Your Rights, Maybe You Can Speak

By Jay Sekulow1572471877647

The House Democrats put forward the rules for an impeachment inquiry. Surrender your constitutional rights and maybe you can speak. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed the rules that are contained in the impeachment inquiry resolution that the House is going to vote on tomorrow. On Fox News,

read more

Democrat Debate: Questions They Need to Answer

By Jay Sekulow1571175198812

The fourth Democrat Presidential debate takes place tonight in Westerville, Ohio at Otterbein University and there are questions the candidates NEED to answer. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we previewed the Democrat Presidential debate that will be moderated by CNN anchors Erin Burnett and Anderson...

read more

Schiff: Whistleblower Testimony Not Needed to Impeach

By Jordan Sekulow1571088236562

It’s outrageous. Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee “Shifty” Adam Schiff now says that whistleblower testimony is NOT NEEDED to impeach the President. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed Rep. Adam Schiff’s comments on Face the Nation stating the whistleblower does not need to testify...

read more