Schiff: Whistleblower Testimony Not Needed to Impeach President | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


It’s outrageous. Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee “Shifty” Adam Schiff now says that whistleblower testimony is NOT NEEDED to impeach the President.

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed Rep. Adam Schiff’s comments on Face the Nation stating the whistleblower does not need to testify to impeach the President. This so-called impeachment inquiry is getting to the level of absurdity.

Here’s what Chairman Schiff said to Margaret Brennan, on Face the Nation:

“Given that we already have the call record, we don't need the whistleblower who wasn't on the call to tell us what took place during the call. We have the best evidence of that. We do want to make sure that we identify other evidence that is pertinent to the withholding of the military support, the effort to cover this up by hiding this in a classified computer system.

We want to make sure that we uncover the full details about the conditionality of either the military aid or that meeting with Ukraine's president. It may not be necessary to take steps that might reveal the whistleblower's identity to do that. And we're going to make sure we protect that whistleblower.”

Chairman Schiff is pushing this absurd idea that they don’t need to hear any testimony, written or oral, from the whistleblower. It would mean that the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee would have no chance to ask questions of the whistleblower in person or in writing. No cross examination.

If you are conducting an impeachment inquiry, although they really aren’t because they haven’t called a vote, you are supposed to conduct as open and transparent process as possible for the American people. We are supposed to be able to see the reasons why they want to remove a duly elected President.

Schiff also said in the same interview that he wanted to conduct the process like a grand jury proceeding, which is extremely secretive and not at all transparent. That is also not constitutional. This is absolutely not a grand jury proceeding. This proceeding should be as open and transparent as possible. What Adam Schiff is doing is abusing the Constitution and the law.

Impeachment does not work that way. It is supposed to work with both sides, Republicans and Democrats, asking questions of those that brought the main subject of impeachment before the Members of Congress, even though it’s come in such a bogus way.

Adam Schiff is afraid to have this whistleblower testify, even in writing because the whistleblower would be asked questions like:

  • How did you obtain this info? You didn’t get it from the transcript. That was released after you filed your report. So how did you get the info?
  • Why did you go to Schiff, maybe even other Democrats, a law firm, and your General Counsel at the CIA before going to the Inspector General of the intelligence community?  Did you go to Nancy Pelosi and her staff?
  • What is your relationship with Joe Biden when he was Vice-President as it has been reported? What is your current relationship with him during the campaign, in light of comments made by the Inspector General that you are partisan? Are there any other relationships that you have, whistleblower, with Democrat candidates?

Those are the questions that Adam Schiff and the House Leadership are afraid of. The American people deserve to know the answers.

You can listen to the entire episode here.

Restore the Constitution. Don’t Shred It.

Constitution  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to restore the Constitution and defeat the Deep State and the Left’s attempts to shred it, have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in

The States’ Power to Postpone Presidential Primaries

By Harry G. Hutchison1584629654682

Given the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many states and localities are taking aggressive measures to combat the spread of the virus. In addition to measures banning large gatherings (we discussed the constitutional implications for churches here ), a number of states and territories have...

read more

Elite Scholars Embrace Hearsay, Thwart the Will of the People

By Harry G. Hutchison1575565156640

Yesterday, hardworking Americans who are often highly disdained by the global elites who populate leading academic centers, were treated to a lecture by four legal scholars. As a former law professor of advanced constitutional law, allow me to share my perspective on yesterday’s events. While it is...

read more

Inquiry Rules: Surrender Your Rights, Maybe You Can Speak

By Jay Sekulow1572471877647

The House Democrats put forward the rules for an impeachment inquiry. Surrender your constitutional rights and maybe you can speak. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed the rules that are contained in the impeachment inquiry resolution that the House is going to vote on tomorrow. On Fox News,

read more

Democrat Debate: Questions They Need to Answer

By Jay Sekulow1571175198812

The fourth Democrat Presidential debate takes place tonight in Westerville, Ohio at Otterbein University and there are questions the candidates NEED to answer. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we previewed the Democrat Presidential debate that will be moderated by CNN anchors Erin Burnett and Anderson...

read more