Defending Common Sense for the 2020 Census | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Defending Common Sense for the 2020 Census

By Erik Zimmerman1528470272975

Governments across the world have conducted censuses to count their citizen and non-citizen populations, and obtain other useful information, since Biblical times. The framers of our Constitution adopted this tradition by mandating that a census be taken every ten years, which has occurred continuously since 1790.

Although it has been said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes, another certainty is debates, controversies, and lawsuits surrounding the census every ten years, critiquing everything from the questions asked to the methods used to maximize accuracy and individual participation. The latest controversy stems from the decision of the Secretary of Commerce to reinstate a question for the 2020 Census concerning United States citizenship status.

Predictably, despite the fact that the content of census questions is a policy matter for Congress and relevant Executive Branch officials to decide, several lawsuits have been filed by various states, cities, and groups claiming that asking a citizenship question on the census is unconstitutional. The ACLJ has filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief in a lawsuit filed in New York City explaining why the Census Bureau is constitutionally authorized to ask the citizenship question.

As our brief notes, the Constitution’s framers intentionally left the details of how each census should be conducted to the discretion of the political branches. The relevant Constitutional clause simply states that the census should be conducted “in such Manner as [Congress] shall by Law direct.” Congress, in turn, has given the Secretary of Commerce broad discretion to determine how the Census Bureau should conduct the census: “The Secretary shall . . . take a decennial census of population . . . in such form and content as he may determine. . . . In connection with any such census, the Secretary is authorized to obtain such other census information as necessary.”

Additionally, the Constitution includes many provisions that differentiate between United States Citizens and other individuals. The Supreme Court has noted that “a host of constitutional and statutory provisions rest on the premise that a legitimate distinction between citizens and aliens may justify attributes and benefits for one class not accorded to the other,” and has also observed that “[a] multitude of federal statutes distinguish between citizens and aliens.” The Census Act itself states that “[a]ll permanent officers and employees of the Bureau shall be citizens of the United States.”

A majority of previous censuses have asked citizenship-related questions, and there will be many valid uses for the citizenship data that the 2020 Census will yield. For instance, data concerning the United States Citizen voting-age population (CVAP) in a particular jurisdiction is often relevant, and necessary, in Voting Rights Act cases. Moreover, some States may desire to consider citizenship data in their future redistricting decisions.

The bottom line is that both the law and common sense dictate that the United States, like any other nation, may conduct a count of its citizen and non-citizen populations. The federal courts should dismiss these meritless lawsuits.

Latest in
Constitution

Radio Recap – In a Bizarre Move, Flynn Judge Lawyers Up

By Jordan Sekulow1590528315633

In a bizarre move , the judge in the General Flynn case has lawyered up. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed the latest bizarre move made by the judge in the Flynn case. Judge Sullivan has hired an attorney to represent him in responding to the D.C. Court of Appeals demand that he respond to...

read more

Radio Recap – Appeals Court to Flynn Judge: Explain Yourself

By Jay Sekulow1590179448546

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in General Flynn’s case issued an order telling the federal district judge to explain himself. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed the appeals court order to the judge in the General Flynn case. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has given Judge Emmet Sullivan...

read more

JSL – Breaking: Flynn’s Attorney Files Emergency Appeal

By Jay Sekulow1590009172861

In an extraordinary move, General Flynn’s attorney made a motion for a writ of mandamus to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed the breaking news that General Flynn’s attorney filed an emergency appeal to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal asks the...

read more

Radio Recap – General Flynn Still Waiting on Justice

By Jordan Sekulow1589576228769

General Michael Flynn is still waiting for justice. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we continued our discussion from yesterday's show about this week's bombshell developments in the General Michael Flynn case, as well as our previous work to expose the truth behind the Obama Administration’s unmasking...

read more