Atheist Michael Newdow Files Another Flawed Lawsuit to Remove “In God We Trust” from Currency | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Another Attempt to Remove “In God We Trust”

By Matthew Clark1452800402923

Avowed atheist Michael Newdow is at it again.  This time he’s just filed a federal lawsuit demanding that “In God We Trust” be removed from U.S. currency.

Think you’ve heard this story before, it’s because you have.  Newdow joined a Freedom From Religion Foundation lawsuit with the same goal in 2013.  Of course that lawsuit, claiming that “In God We Trust” – our National Motto – on currency was somehow proselytizing, was thrown out of federal court.  It literally didn’t make it past the district court stage.

Now Newdow is renewing the same trite attempt to eviscerate our National Motto – and with it our religious heritage – from our currency.  This time, he is claiming that the National Motto on our currency somehow constitutes an unconstitutional “religious test” for “office or public trust under the United States.”  That’s absolutely ludicrous.

But the ridiculous legal assertions don’t stop there.  As the Christian Post reports:

Michael Newdow, an atheist activist from California, filed the latest lawsuit in Ohio, listing 41 people as plaintiffs on the complaint, including the Northern Ohio Freethought Society and residents of Ohio and Michigan.

The lawsuit, which refers to "God" as "G-d," claims that the presence of "In God We Trust" on U.S. currency violates the separation of church and state and creates an anti-atheist, pro-Christian sentiment in the U.S.

"The 'In G-d We Trust' phrase has continued to be a tool used to perpetuate favoritism for (Christian) Monotheism," the 112-page lawsuit states, adding "It has also continued to perpetuate anti-Atheistic bias."

This legally flawed reasoning should lead to the same result as Newdow’s and his angry atheist allies’ numerous other failed legal attacks on our religious heritage as a nation.  It should be thrown out of court.

Newdow has also tried and failed to remove “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.  In 2004, the ACLJ filed a major amicus brief at the Supreme Court in that case on behalf of 68 Members of Congress and over 260,000 Americans, helping to successfully defeat this outrageous legal challenge.  We’ve filed briefs in a number of Newdow’s failed attacks on inaugural prayer and our National Motto.

Although we have successfully assisted in ultimately defeating many of Newdow’s flawed lawsuits in federal court, the fact remains that it only takes one federal judge in one district court to change everthing.

That is why we must remain vigilant in defending the Constitution from each and every one of these atheist assaults on our religious heritage.  We are looking in to filing an amicus brief in this latest case at the appropriate stage to defend our National Motto, “In God We Trust,” on our currency.

This article is crossposted at RedState.com.

Defend “In God We Trust”

Constitution  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re aggressively defending “In God We Trust” - our National Motto - from attack. We can win. Chip in $5 or more to DOUBLE your impact. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Constitution

President Trump Acquitted Again (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1613425682715

The second impeachment trial of President Trump in the U.S. Senate has concluded, and just as we predicted, President Trump was acquitted . . . again. Today on Sekulow , we discussed the end of the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump. In a result that surprised no one, President Donald...

read more

Did House Impeachment Managers Falsify Evidence? (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1613171494333

Did House impeachment managers actually falsify evidence of another private citizen during the impeachment trial? Today on Sekulow , we discussed this week in the Senate impeachment trial. Today, President Trump’s attorneys began their presentations. We’re on day four of the Senate impeachment...

read more

Day 3: How Much Longer Will the Impeachment Trial Last? (Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1613081841323

The unconstitutional impeachment trial continues. How much longer will it last? Today on Sekulow , we discussed the Senate impeachment trial, as the House impeachment managers put on their full attack on President Trump, trying to make a connection between the President’s words and the horrific...

read more

Impeachment 2: Day 2 (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1612996516086

It is day two of the second impeachment trial, and the Left is attacking all conservatives. Today on Sekulow , we discussed the unconstitutional Senate impeachment trial. Yesterday, fifty-six senators voted that the trial was constitutional and that it would continue. Yet the fact remains that this...

read more