ACLJ Files Court Brief to Protect American Election Process From Abuse | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


ACLJ Files Brief to Protect Election Process

By Jay Sekulow1480725790977

Just days ago we told you about the efforts being made to undermine the American election system with challenges being raised in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. We told you about our letter to the Pennsylvania election officials urging them to ensure that local law is meticulously followed.

We told you we would monitor the situation and engage as necessary.

We have engaged. Today, we filed an amicus brief with the Pennsylvania appellate court hearing the election recount lawsuit, on behalf of thousands of Americans and many concerned Pennsylvanians.

The case is set for a hearing Monday morning.  The court needs to resolve this suit before a critical federal deadline that’s just around the corner on December 13, 2016.

In our brief, we made the case that the leftist activists who filed the lawsuit simply failed to allege anything that supported their “belief” and “concern” that the Pennsylvania presidential election was “illegal.”   The Petitioners identified three reasons that, they contended, the court should order a recount:  (1) an “expert” opinion that said that hacking is possible; (2) Democrat National Committee (DNC) and voter registration databases in Arizona and Illinois were hacked; and (3) the actual results were inconsistent with the pre-election polls.

We tackled each of these reasons and explained why it failed to justify a recount under state law. First, there was no evidence presented of any hacking; second, there was no evidence presented about any hacking or fraud in Pennsylvania, just unrelated speculation; and third, even the petitioners’ own supposed “expert” concluded that “the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong.”  In sum, the anarchist activists attempting to undermine the election process simply have no case.

In conclusion we argued:

All three bases miss the mark.  Perhaps, Petitioners must believe, if they allege enough hypothetical, hyperbole, and computer activity unrelated to the Commonwealth’s 2016 election, something will stick.  But reliance on three legally insufficient grounds does not generate a legally sufficient petition.  The product of three times zero is still zero.

We argued that a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion, “directly on point, forecloses Petitioners’ scheme.” According to that opinion:

As we noted before, the court will not grope in the dark, or follow a contestant on a fishing expedition, in the hope of being able to find enough to enable him by the investigation to make out his case.

We also argued that, “[t]o prevail, Petitioners must present evidence at the hearing of actual illegal electronic vote manipulation — something not even alleged or identified in their Petition.  Even if this Court were to overlook the legal insufficiencies of Petitioners’ pleading, it must not overlook a glaring lack of evidence.”

Just like we told the court:

The policy of the Pennsylvania General Assembly in protecting its citizens’ right to seek a judicially supervised recount when evidence of foul play has surfaced is critically important.  This Petition makes a mockery of that policy and cheapens and jeopardizes that protection.

Finally, we urged the “Court to filter out the facially baseless claim made by the Petitioners herein and in so doing, preserve the integrity of the Commonwealth’s 2016 presidential election, its Election Code, its citizens’ constitutional rights, and the American election process.”

American elections are the envy of the world. We will continue to do everything we can to make sure they always are. We will continue to monitor this case, and the others, and bring you any new important developments.

Join us and take a stand against partisan activists intent on delegitimizing America’s election system.

UPDATE 12.5.2016: The leftist agitators have just dismissed their lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court. Through your voice we helped soundly defeated their first attempt to undermine the election process in state court. But now they’ve promised to file a federal lawsuit today demanding the same arbitrary recount. We are ready to file another critical amicus brief in federal court to uphold the integrity of our election process.

Defend the Integrity of the Election Process

Constitution  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we battle to defend the constitutional election process, we urgently need your support. Chip in $5 or more now. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in

ACLJ Files 2nd Brief for the 2020 Census

By Erik Zimmerman1531922400000

The framers of our Constitution wisely adopted the practice, utilized by many governments since Biblical times, of mandating that a census be regularly taken to count the citizen and non-citizen populations, and obtain other useful information. The relevant Constitutional clause leaves the details...

read more

Judges Continue Being Confirmed at Record Pace

By ACLJ.org1528812000000

As we have detailed previously, one of the most important aspects of presidential power is the ability to nominate federal judges – judges who will determine how the Constitution is interpreted for decades to come. We have been aggressively working behind the scenes to ensure that qualified...

read more

Defending Common Sense for the 2020 Census

By Erik Zimmerman1528470272975

Governments across the world have conducted censuses to count their citizen and non-citizen populations, and obtain other useful information, since Biblical times. The framers of our Constitution adopted this tradition by mandating that a census be taken every ten years, which has occurred...

read more

Senate Confirms Mike Pompeo and Ric Grenell

By Nathanael Bennett1524769466756

In a major victory for U.S. diplomacy, the U.S. Senate has confirmed Mike Pompeo to be Secretary of State and Ric Grenell to be U.S. Ambassador to Germany. Mr. Pompeo was confirmed by a vote of 57-42 and Mr. Grenell was confirmed by a vote of 56-42. As we have previously reported, these two...

read more