Court Calls Out Angry Atheists for Near Supernatural Claims Against the Ground Zero Cross | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Claims Against the Ground Zero Cross

By Matthew Clark1404744954000

From day one, angry atheists have made outlandish claims about the Ground Zero Cross – the two intersecting steel beams in the shape of a cross that was found in the wreckage of the World Trade Center following 9/11.

Not only have they made these absurd claims in public (calling it “offensive and repugnant”), they’ve made them in federal court.  Now a federal appeals court is calling them out and demanding they provide a rational explanation as to how their “offense” constitutes a constitutional claim.

When the American Atheists first filed their lawsuit in state court seeking to have the cross torn down and removed from the National 9/11 Memorial and Museum, they actually asserted in their complaint that their members were experiencing “dyspepsia [upset stomach], symptoms of depression, headaches, anxiety, and mental pain and anguish” as a “direct and proximate result of the unconstitutional existence of the cross.”

When the case was removed from state to federal court, the angry atheists quickly dropped their bizarre claims about the cross causing them upset stomachs, but continued arguing that the mere “existence of the cross” was causing them “depression, headaches, anxiety, and mental pain and anguish.”

Reading their legal claims actually starts to make one wonder if these angry atheists, who vehemently oppose the very idea of the supernatural, are somehow ascribing near supernatural power to the cross.

A federal court threw out their lawsuit last year.  Unsurprisingly, the immediate reaction of American Atheists President David Silverman was “We are angry . . . .”  On appeal, these angry atheists are arguing that they are “offended” by the Ground Zero Cross.

Now a federal appeals court is demanding that this angry atheist group explain just how their “offense” becomes a constitutional crisis.  As Fox News explains:

The judge has now given the plaintiffs until July 14 to file supplemental legal briefs before deciding whether the case will proceed. Among the questions that must be answered in the new filings is how the offensiveness of the cross, which the plaintiffs view as a Christian symbol for all 9-11 victims, becomes a “constitutional injury.”

The other question is -- if the plaintiffs indeed feel displaying the cross “marginalizes them as American citizens” -- then how is that a “particular and concrete injury" compared to just “the abstract stigmatization of atheists generally.”

The judge has also asked the plaintiffs to substantiate their claim the museum and Sept. 11 memorial are getting taxpayer dollars.

The court is exactly right.  As we argued in our amicus brief before the court on behalf of over 230,000 Americans, “Offended observers (even observers whose offense is so great that they claim physical illness) cannot be permitted to rewrite history or constitutional precedent.  Acknowledging history does not establish a religion, and Plaintiffs-Appellants’ lawsuit is without merit.”

The fact remains that the cross is an actual piece of 9/11 history that really meant something to real people (the first responders who said it gave them hope as they valiantly worked in the days following the terrorist attacks).  No amount of angry atheist offense will change this fact.

These angry atheists will have a hard time convincing the court otherwise.  We’ll continue to keep you updated as this case continues.

This article is crossposted on Red State.

Happy(?) Birthday Socialism

By Wesley Smith1510938110684

Last week marked the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the culmination of a two-part revolution that removed Czar Nicholas and established the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or the USSR. It is a dark date in history. The brutal murder of the Czar, his wife and their...

read more

Honoring Those Who Serve: Veterans Day 2017

By Wesley Smith1510239600000

Veterans Day is Saturday, November 11th, but will be commemorated this Friday, November 10th, as a Federal Holiday. Formerly known as Armistice Day, this holiday was originally created to commemorate the end of World War I, which officially took place on November 11, 1918. That war was referred to...

read more

Victory: Court Upholds Legislative Prayer

By Edward White1504733251382

Today, the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc —that is, all active judges rather than the usual three— upheld the Jackson County, Michigan, Board of Commissioners’ practice of starting its meetings with prayer. The American Center for Law & Justice (“ACLJ”) filed an amicus...

read more

The Latest Ten Commandments Case at Supreme Court

By Geoffrey Surtees1502410824571

Today, we filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the City of Bloomfield, New Mexico and a Ten Commandments monument that is displayed on public property outside of their city hall. The ACLJ has represented local governments, officials, and private parties in numerous lawsuits...

read more