Washington Times - Senate Confirms Samuel Alito as the Nation's 110th Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
February 1, 2006
By Charles
Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The Senate yesterday
confirmed Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. as the 110th justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
After a private swearing-in ceremony at the
Supreme Court, Justice Alito took the front-row seat of Sandra Day O'Connor at President
Bush's State of the Union address before Congress last night.
Yesterday's 58-42 vote in the Senate was the
second-narrowest Supreme Court confirmation in more than a century. It ended a
tumultuous seven months since former Justice O'Connor announced her retirement and
rewards a decades-long effort by conservatives to reshape the court.
"This is a monumental step forward," Sen.
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican, said shortly after the largely partisan vote in which
Justice Alito received 20 fewer votes than Mr. Bush's first Supreme Court nominee, Chief
Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
Democratic Sens.
Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Tim Johnson of South
Dakota and Ben Nelson of Nebraska joined almost all the chamber's Republicans in
supporting the nomination. Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island was the only Republican
to oppose confirmation.
"Sam Alito is a
brilliant and fair-minded judge who strictly interprets the Constitution and laws and
does not legislate from the bench," Mr. Bush said yesterday before his State of the
Union speech. "He is a man of deep character and integrity, and he will make all
Americans proud as a justice on our highest court."
During his address to Congress last night, Mr.
Bush thanked the Senate for confirming Justices Roberts and Alito.
"I will continue to nominate men and women who
understand that judges must be servants of the law and not legislate from the bench," he
said, to a standing ovation from half the chamber.
Another White House ceremony in Judge Alito's
honor is scheduled for today, at which he will recite his oath of office a second time.
Justice O'Connor's retirement, which was
quickly followed by the death of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, was the Supreme
Court's first departure in 11 years, a time during which liberals and conservatives
amassed millions of dollars and marshaled thousands of volunteers for the pending fight.
Liberals boasted scalps from previous
nominations, most notably that of former federal Judge Robert H. Bork, whose 1987
nomination by President Reagan ended in a demoralizing defeat for conservatives. In
1991, they came within three votes of defeating the confirmation of Justice Clarence
Thomas.
Such fights left Republicans gun-shy
about pushing nominees with well-established conservative judicial philosophies. In
1990, for instance, President George Bush named "stealth nominee" David H. Souter, who
has disappointed conservatives by becoming a reliable liberal vote on the high court.
But the current president, who has campaigned
twice on a promise to put conservatives on the court, hasn't shied from a fight.
Mr. Hatch, former chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, said he has greater hope in the federal courts "than I have in many
years" with Justices Roberts and Alito on the high court.
"I don't think either of them is going to be a
Souter," he said yesterday. "To be honest, when David Souter was confirmed, I knew he
would be a moderate or liberal."
The
confirmations also come after a host of high-profile federal court rulings that have
stirred public resentment toward the courts.
In recent years, federal courts have struck down "under God" in the Pledge of
Allegiance, ruled unconstitutional a state amendment against homosexual "marriage" and
approved expanded eminent domain laws that let the government seize private property.
As if on cue, separate rulings yesterday from
the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and 2nd Circuit ruled unconstitutional a federal
ban on "partial-birth" abortion. That ruling means that the Supreme Court, with Mr.
Bush's newly minted justices, will almost certainly review one of the most significant
abortion cases in recent years.
At this,
conservatives cheered while pro-choice supporters saw a terrible omen of things to come.
"The Senate voted to confirm Judge Alito to
the Supreme Court where he will likely hear cases involving a woman's health very soon,"
said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who opposed both of Mr. Bush's
nominees for fear they will curtail the federal right to abortion. "It is my hope that
he follows the path of his predecessor, Justice O'Connor. Unfortunately, I fear he may
not." Jay Sekulow, chief counsel
for the conservative American Center for Law and Justice, said Judge Alito will serve
with "honor and distinction."
"This is an
important and proud day for America," he said after the vote. "We know that the
conservative judicial philosophy that Judge Alito embraced as a federal appeals court
judge for 15 years will serve as the cornerstone of his tenure on the high court. Judge
Alito understands the limited role of the judiciary and is committed to interpreting the
Constitution, not rewriting it."