Washington Times - NARAL Anti-Roberts Ad Called "Flawed" and "Reprehensible"
August 11, 2005
By Charles
Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Conservatives and an independent fact-checking group are picking apart the
pro-choice TV ad targeting Supreme Court nominee Judge John G. Roberts Jr., but Senate
Democrats are staying out of the fracas.
The
ad -- run by NARAL Pro-Choice America -- accuses Judge Roberts of supporting a violent
anti-abortion activist in a brief he wrote for a Supreme Court case while working as
deputy solicitor general in the first President Bush's administration.
The conservative American Center for Law and
Justice called the ad "factually flawed and reprehensible." The unaffiliated Annenberg
Public Policy Center said the ad gives a "false implication."
Senate Democrats, however, were avoiding the
whole controversy by declining to comment, because, aides said, they had not seen the
ad.
Republicans were not so silent.
Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican and member
of the Judiciary Committee, said the accusations are the same ones that liberals have
cast at nominees for decades. He recalled a flier at one rally against Supreme Court
Justice David H. Souter that warned: "Stop Souter or women will die."
"So these charges are not new, and the attacks
are little more than recycled slander," Mr. Cornyn said. "I hope my colleagues can
resist this low-road approach to what should be a fair, thorough and dignified
confirmation process."
The Annenberg study of
the ad concluded that it "misleads when it says Roberts supported a clinic bomber."
"It is true that Roberts sided with the bomber
and many other defendants in a civil case, but the case didn't deal with bombing at
all," the Annenberg analysis said. "Roberts argued that abortion clinics who brought the
suit had no right use an 1871 federal anti-discrimination statute against anti-abortion
protesters who tried to blockade clinics. Eventually, a 6-3 majority of the Supreme
Court agreed, too. Roberts argued that blockades were already illegal under state law."
Annenberg also said the images used in the ad
are "especially misleading" because the pictures of a clinic bombing used in the ad
happened nearly seven years after Judge Roberts wrote his legal brief.
Also yesterday, the National Association of
Manufacturers endorsed Judge Roberts -- the first such endorsement in the trade group's
110-year history.
"Judge Roberts' record is
one that fully qualifies him as a Justice who will interpret the law as written, not an
activist who will legislate from the bench," said NAM President John Engler. "Business
depends on a legal system that is fair and
predictable."