ACLJ Encouraged that Federal Appeals Court Rejects Newdow Challenge to Inaugural Prayer | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion



January 17, 2005

(Washington, DC) The American Center for Law and Justice, focusing on constitutional law, said today it is pleased that a federal appeals court has rejected a request by Michael Newdow to prohibit prayer at this Thursday's Presidential inauguration.  A federal district court on Friday rejected Newdow's request for an injunction to stop the clergy prayers and late Sunday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected his appeal.  Newdow is now expected to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to step in and stop the prayers.

"We're delighted to see the courts continue to uphold a time-honored tradition and we have every reason to believe that the prayers will take place as scheduled on Thursday," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ, which has challenged Newdow's lawsuits in the past.  "This legal challenge has no merit and the courts have repeatedly held that such expressions do not violate the constitution.  We're pleased that now a second court -- a federal appeals court -- has rejected this faulty challenge.  If Newdow persists and asks the Supreme Court to get involved, we will support the Department of Justice's position and file a brief with the high court in support of the constitutionality of the prayers."

On Friday, a federal district court rejected Michael Newdows challenge and late Sunday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the appeal.  Newdow has said he will take the case to the Supreme Court. 

In a decision issued on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge John Bates rejected Newdows legal challenge saying there is a strong argument, that at this late date, the public interest would best be served by allowing the 2005 Inauguration ceremony to proceed on January 20 as planned.  

The court continued:  That would be consistent with the inclusion of clergy prayer in all Presidential inaugurations since 1937, and with the inclusion of religious prayer or reference in every inauguration commencing with the first inauguration of President Washington in 1789.  To do otherwise, moreover, would at this eleventh hour cause considerable disruption in a significant, carefully-planned, national event, requiring programming and other adjustments.  The material change requested by Newdow in an accepted and well-established historical pattern of short prayers or religious references during Presidential inaugurations, based on this last-minute challenge, is not likely to serve the public interest, particularly where Newdows ability to proceed with this action remains in doubt and there is no clear evidence of impermissible sectarian proselytizing.

In briefs filed in connection with this case, the ACLJ contends the constitutionality of the inaugural prayer is settled law with the Supreme Court in 1983 concluding in its decision in Marsh v. Chambers that the opening of sessions of legislative and other deliberative public bodies with prayer is deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country.  The high court also noted that the First Congress did not consider opening prayers as a proselytizing activity or as symbolically placing the governments official seal of approval on one religious view.

Last year, the ACLJ filed a brief at the Supreme Court opposing Newdows challenge to the Pledge of Allegiance, which the high court rejected.  Newdow has filed a new lawsuit once again challenging the Pledge and the ACLJ will again file briefs opposing that challenge.  

The ACLJ is based in Washington, D.C.

Latest in

The ACLJ Launches New “ACLJ Official” Instagram Page

By ACLJ.org1538667569749

We’re expanding our reach across every platform to defend freedom and religious liberty all over the world. Now we’ve taken our stories to Instagram . As technology continues to evolve every day, we must find more ways to tell the stories of persecuted Christians and to share the work the ACLJ is...

read more

The ACLJ’s Agenda for Reform is Advancing

By Harry G. Hutchison1533309591107

Shortly after President Trump’s election, the ACLJ issued its ambitious agenda for reform . Our agenda proposed the repeal and replacement of Obamacare with a focus on the advancement of a patient-centered, consumer-driven program emphasizing choice and competition, including taking affirmative...

read more

A New Year Filled with Challenges and Hope

By Jay Sekulow1514577600000

As a new year approaches, it’s the perfect time to reflect on where we’ve been and the hope for tomorrow and the new year to come. Thanks to the continued support of ACLJ members like you, 2017 was a very important and impactful year in our continuing quest to defend the rights and liberties of all...

read more

The Promise of Christmas: The Light of the World is Born

By Jay Sekulow1513964028237

As we prepare to celebrate the Nativity of the Lord this Christmas with our families and friends, we are reminded of the promise and hope Christmas morning brings. On Christmas morning more than two thousand years ago, God’s only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, was born in Bethlehem. Following the...

read more