What about the Abortion Tax Loophole? | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


By Nathanael Bennett1312579572000

There has been a lot of talk lately about “closing tax loopholes,” with particular attention paid to the tax treatment of corporate jets and oil companies. To be sure, the tax code could certainly use some simplification (ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow can speak to this, given his prior experience as a tax trial attorney in the Office of the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service). However, in typical partisan fashion, the loopholes that are being targeted have far more to do with politics than sound policy.

For example, despite the fact that polls consistently show that Americans do not want to fund abortions with their tax dollars, did you know that elective abortions are tax-deductible? Yes, you heard that correctly…abortions have their very own tax loophole.

Section 213 of federal tax code allows for medical expenses to be deducted from an individual’s taxable income, providing that they spent at least 7.5% (this threshold will soon be 10% as stipulated by Obamacare) of their income on qualifying health care expenses. It would seem reasonable that this deduction would be reserved for true medical expenses, especially given the Left’s penchant for touting “preventative care.” However, as clearly stated on page five of IRS publication 502, “you can include in medical expenses the amount you pay for a legal abortion.”

It’s difficult to estimate how many abortions are deducted each year, but there can be no doubt that this abortion loophole results in indirect taxpayer subsidization of an extremely large number of abortions. And it’s reasonable, given the American People’s opposition to favorable tax treatment for abortions, to ask why the President is willing to talk about corporate jet loopholes without also targeting the abortion loophole.

Could it be that the President doesn’t know about the abortion loophole? That’s unlikely, given that language to close this loophole passed the U.S. House of Representatives earlier this year, before stalling in the Senate. It seems much more likely that the President simply likes the abortion loophole more than the other loopholes.

It’s a sad fact, given both the innocent lives claimed by these abortions and the overwhelming opposition of the American People to subsidizing them. It’s time to close the abortion loophole.

Latest in
Pro Life

ACLJ Asks Supreme Court to Take Big Abortion Case

By Jordan Sekulow1520899200000

The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) has filed another brief with the Supreme Court of the United States asking the Court to review the case involving the undercover investigation of the abortion industry conducted by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP). The brief supports the petition...

read more

Protecting Free Speech Rights of Pro-Life Centers

By Walter M. Weber1520277349542

The ACLJ filed a friend-of-the-court brief today in the Supreme Court in an important free speech case from California. The case is First Resort, Inc. v. Herrera . At stake are the free speech rights of pro-life pregnancy centers and, indeed, countless charitable agencies. Here's the background:

read more

ACLJ Files Lawsuit to Defend Pro-Life Counselors

By Francis J. Manion1520019702758

The Supreme Court of the United States has long recognized that the right to use public sidewalks “for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions . . . has, from ancient times, been a part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of...

read more

The Fight Against Eugenic Abortion is Now

By Olivia Summers1519657200000

Just over a week ago, we celebrated the fact that Lucas Warren—an 18-month-old who has Down syndrome—was selected as Gerber’s Spokesbaby for 2018. Lucas’ dad, Jason Warren, stated : “We’re hoping this will impact everyone — that it will shed a little bit of light on the special needs community and...

read more