What about the Abortion Tax Loophole? | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Nathanael Bennett1312579572000

There has been a lot of talk lately about “closing tax loopholes,” with particular attention paid to the tax treatment of corporate jets and oil companies. To be sure, the tax code could certainly use some simplification (ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow can speak to this, given his prior experience as a tax trial attorney in the Office of the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service). However, in typical partisan fashion, the loopholes that are being targeted have far more to do with politics than sound policy.

For example, despite the fact that polls consistently show that Americans do not want to fund abortions with their tax dollars, did you know that elective abortions are tax-deductible? Yes, you heard that correctly…abortions have their very own tax loophole.

Section 213 of federal tax code allows for medical expenses to be deducted from an individual’s taxable income, providing that they spent at least 7.5% (this threshold will soon be 10% as stipulated by Obamacare) of their income on qualifying health care expenses. It would seem reasonable that this deduction would be reserved for true medical expenses, especially given the Left’s penchant for touting “preventative care.” However, as clearly stated on page five of IRS publication 502, “you can include in medical expenses the amount you pay for a legal abortion.”

It’s difficult to estimate how many abortions are deducted each year, but there can be no doubt that this abortion loophole results in indirect taxpayer subsidization of an extremely large number of abortions. And it’s reasonable, given the American People’s opposition to favorable tax treatment for abortions, to ask why the President is willing to talk about corporate jet loopholes without also targeting the abortion loophole.

Could it be that the President doesn’t know about the abortion loophole? That’s unlikely, given that language to close this loophole passed the U.S. House of Representatives earlier this year, before stalling in the Senate. It seems much more likely that the President simply likes the abortion loophole more than the other loopholes.

It’s a sad fact, given both the innocent lives claimed by these abortions and the overwhelming opposition of the American People to subsidizing them. It’s time to close the abortion loophole.

Latest in
Pro Life

Urging Supreme Court to Protect the Most Defenseless

By Walter M. Weber1542326760000

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the Supreme Court to review an abortion case out of Indiana. The case, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) , involves two provisions of Indiana law that were struck down by the lower...

read more

Piercing Big Abortion’s Shroud of Secrecy

By Erik Zimmerman1541777969588

We have recently joined a motion in an ongoing abortion industry lawsuit asking a federal court to require critical documents concerning Big Abortion’s sale of aborted babies’ body parts to be turned over. In 2015, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released a series of videos that showed senior...

read more

ACLJ Files Lawsuit to Protect Pro-Life Free Speech

By Michelle Terry1541170948318

Today the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) filed a lawsuit in federal court in Iowa on behalf of two individuals, Anthony Miano and Nicholas Rolland, challenging a state statute that infringes upon their right to advocate for the lives of the unborn outside of Planned Parenthood and other...

read more

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Deals Blow to Big Abortion

By Olivia Summers1539956957514

Recently, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Louisiana law that “ requires abortion facilities to meet basic health and safety standards .” Specifically, the law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. This is a victory for the lives of unborn babies,

read more