Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Nathanael Bennett1307640191000

The uproar over the TSA security measures is reverberating on Capitol Hill and in Washington.  Members of Congress are speaking out and urging the TSA to do what Israel does when it comes to airport security - profile passengers.

And, now we've discovered that applicants to the TSA are not automatically disqualified from seeking employment - even if they've been convicted of a violent felony - including rape or sexual assault - because it depends on the time frame of the conviction. Our legal memo detailing this troubling finding is here.

Our legal and research teams have uncovered new information about how the TSA views serious criminal offenses - including child pornography sexual battery - in its application for employment.
 
This is the application for a Transportation Security Officer with the TSA.  We're talking about the TSA employees who conduct the pat-downs and strip searches at our nation's airports.

The TSA application clearly states that by law "TSA is prohibited from employing persons with certain convictions" including murder, assault with intent to murder, rape or aggravated sexual assault.  But there's a catch. The employment application includes this troubling disclaimer:  "Conviction within the last 10 years of any one or more of the crimes listed below will disqualify you for employment with TSA."   Here's the U.S. Code that spells it out.  49 U.S.C. 44936  

That's right - you're disqualified for TSA employment only if these felony convictions have occurred within the last 10 years.  And, there's more.  The TSA does not even list serious offenses like child pornography or sexual battery in the listing of criminal offenses that would disqualify applicants. 

All of this is detailed in the ACLJ's legal memo on this topic posted here.

So here's the bottom line:  Although the TSA declares that it is "prohibited [by law] from employing persons with certain convictions," that "prohibition" is only enforceable within a ten-year window and for only a list of crimes, which does not include serious offenses such as child pornography or sexual battery.

Why would the TSA ever consider anyone for employment who's been convicted of such felonies - regardless of when those convictions occurred?  And why isn't child pornography or sexual battery included in the list of criminal offenses that disqualify a job applicant?  Any applicant who's been convicted of these offenses should be immediately disqualified from seeking TSA employment.  Period. 
 
We're not suggesting that the TSA is hiring convicted felons.  No, but an employment policy that does not immediately disqualify those applicants convicted of dangerous felonies - no matter when the convictions have occurred - raises serious concerns.
 
Jordan Sekulow revealed this new discovery today in an interview with Sean Hannity on his radio broadcast.  You can listen to it here.

In addition, the TSA pat-downs and strip searches are raising even more objections in the halls of Congress.  Rep. John L. Mica, (R-FL) said the TSA should look at Israel, which uses early detection techniques at airports.  And incoming Rep. Allen West (R-FL) says he wants to do what Israel does - he wants security officers to profile potential terrorists at airports.  In his words:  "There are two aspects of terrorism. One aspect of terrorism is to kill you. The other aspect of terrorism is to create a disruption of your lifestyle through fear and intimidation."
  
The TSA needs to adopt a sound, effective security strategy - like Israel - where the emphasis is put on gathering intelligence and data about passengers - information that's crucial in highlighting the most likely suspects.

Stand with the ACLJ and send a message to Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano - it's time to target the terrorists.  Add your name now now to our petition.

 

Latest in
Jihad

Face to Face with ISIS

By Matthew Clark1414086533968

It was only a matter of time, but now Canada, a strong ally of the United States and freedom, has been struck with the brutal reality of radical Islamic jihadist terror. This week not one but two separate terrorist attacks on Canada’s military personnel have ravaged the country. First on Monday, a...

read more

A Good Week for Jihadists

By David French1413313445256

It’s only Tuesday, and it’s already been a very good week for the Middle East’s jihadists. First, despite America’s periodic air attacks, the Islamic State has not only taken half of Kobani, the Kurdish town on the Turkish/Syrian border, it’s also advancing deep into Iraq – taking Iraqi Army bases...

read more

When at War Borders Need to be Secure

By Jay Sekulow1413308602450

A nation at war needs to secure its borders. It is simply astonishing that a statement like that—a matter of simple common sense and basic national sovereignty—is politically controversial. It is simply astonishing that we’re left debating—like we did last week—whether the arrest of four...

read more

ISIS in Our Midst?

By Matthew Clark1413300781746

For years we’ve heard the threat that our porous border with Mexico could become a free pass for terrorists to enter America. Now that threat appears to be a reality. There are numerous reports that ISIS terrorists have crossed our southern border and are now in America. Representative Duncan...

read more