A judge has refused to prevent a state voter ID law from going into effect.
Opponents of the voter ID law filed a lawsuit claiming that the law – which was enacted to combat voter fraud – violates the Constitution. In an extensive and thorough legal opinion, the judge refused to grant a preliminary injunction against the law, thus allowing the law to go into effect.
As summarized by the court, the Pennsylvania state law simply provides that in order “to vote in person, everyone must present a photo ID that can be obtained for free.”
The court found that the fundamental right to vote must be balanced “with the state’s interest in preserving the integrity of its elections and guarding against abuses of the elective franchise.” The Court determined that requiring someone to present a valid photo ID in order to cast their ballot did not add any unconstitutional voting requirements.
As Jay Sekulow, ACLJ Chief Counsel, told Fox News, “this is going to protect the integrity and reliability of the voting process.”
Voter ID laws are not unreasonable, especially when, as here, the state provides them free of charge. As we have previously detailed, there are many, seemingly everyday, events that require photo IDs, such as “cashing checks, getting a loan from a pawn shop, obtaining a library card, and, depending on how old you are or how young you look, buying cigarettes and alcohol.”
In fact, as Jay Sekulow noted, a photo ID is needed to even enter the Department of Justice building – a department that has repeatedly challenged voter ID laws around the country.
Even left-leaning constitutional attorneys have admitted that this court’s opinion is “well-reasoned and will be … difficult to reverse in the appeal to the state supreme court.”
Requiring a photo ID to vote – which the trial court noted was a relatively “minor change” to the state’s voting requirements – is a reasonable and constitutional method to prevent voter fraud.
Here we go again! The Obama Administration just can’t seem to admit that the attack by a radicalized Muslim Army major that killed and injured dozens at Fort Hood, Texas, constituted a combat situation equivalent to combat situations elsewhere in the world. As you will doubtless recall, the...
A federal court in Texas has once again vindicated the U.S. Constitution, the rule of law, and the separation of powers against President Obama’s Executive overreach on immigration. The court agreed with our argument in our amicus brief on behalf of over 158,000 Americans that President Obama’s...
Yesterday, the International Criminal Court “ welcomed ” Palestine as a “State Party” to the Rome Statute, the international treaty governing the ICC. Most of the coverage focused on the implications for Israel, as the PA has declared its intentions to file complaints against Israel for its conduct...
In just the last few weeks and months, we’ve secured some major victories for faith and freedom. Your continued support makes this possible. By signing petitions, joining letters, and adding your name to briefs, you are defending the Constitution, protecting lives, and fighting for the persecuted.