Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1307562357000

It's a significant step toward victory in our ongoing effort to safeguard religious freedom around the globe.  

For the first time since 1999, the Organization for the Islamic Conference (OIC) has not introduced a "defamation of religions" resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva.  Instead, the 47-member Council has approved a resolution that focuses more on an individuals freedom to believe as they choose - no longer referring to the "defamation" concept and dropping all direct references to Islam.

As you know, this is an effort that the ACLJ and our European affiliate, the European Centre for Law and Justice, (ECLJ) have been engaged in for many years.  The "defamation of religions" concept is extremely harmful to the rights of Christians and other religious minorities around the globe.  It literally gave cover to blasphemy and anti-conversion laws that threaten the lives of believers in many parts of the world.

We have worked at both the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva and at the General Assembly in New York City to expose the legal flaws with this resolution.  The result has been a rapid and significant decline in support for the "defamation of religions" resolution, with the most recent version being approved by a mere 12 votes at the General Assembly in December of last year.

While this marks an important move in the right direct, we remain cautious about whether these countries take the next step and actually put words into action.  The fact is Christians remain in grave danger in many Muslim countries - like Pakistan - and we will continue to monitor the situation closely.

While the change in language is encouraging, we remain concerned about the resolution's call for countries to "adopt measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief." 

If it becomes clear that this language, too, has become an excuse to stifle the sharing of the Gospel or the free exercise of one's faith, we will not hesitate to engage this issue aggressively.

This new resolution is certainly welcomed, but does not represent an all out victory.  It does underscore the fact, though, that we need to remain vigilant in the global pursuit to ensure that the freedom of individuals to choose their own believe system, including Christianity, is protected.

Dangers of the Palestinian Accession

By Skip Ash1428495138684

On April 1, 2015, the Palestinian Authority – along with its terrorist “Unity Government” partner Hamas – officially became a member “state” of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This is problematic for a number of reasons. First, since the Palestinian Authority (PA), known as “Palestine” by...

read more

Terrorist-led P.A. Joins ICC

By Jay Sekulow1427921979696

The Palestinian Authority – led by the terrorist group Hamas – is taking lawfare against Israel to a new level. Despite opposition from the United States, Israel, and Canada, the Palestinian Authority formally joined the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague today, becoming the 123rd...

read more

Defending Liberty in Zimbabwe

By ACLJ.org1420059677879

Zimbabwe’s capital city Harare hosts the African Centre for Law & Justice, the ACLJ’s international affiliate in Zimbabwe. To understand the work we have been engaged in throughout 2014, defending Law, Justice, and God-given liberties secured by the constitution, it is important to understand the...

read more

2014: An Intense & Victorious Year

By ACLJ.org1419882085613

2014 has been a very active, intense, and fruitful year for the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), the ACLJ’s international affiliate in Europe. Based in Strasbourg, France near the Council of Europe and the European Parliament, ECLJ continued advocating for the protection of Human Rights,

read more