The Slavic Centre for Law and Justice (SCLJ) – the Russian affiliate of the ACLJ – has won a major victory for churches and the rule of law in an area of the world where churches still face heavy regulation from the state.
The SCLJ won a case before the Constitutional Court of Russia that will help prevent prosecutors from filing frivolous lawsuits against churches and other citizens.
As the SCLJ noted, in Russia, it is critical that “[e]ach action brought against the Church . . . be taken seriously because the law on religious organizations specifies that a religious organization may be dissolved if it ‘repeatedly or grossly’ violated the law.”
Prior to the SCLJ’s victory, prosecutors were allowed to file frivolous lawsuits, force the responding party to proceed through numerous hearings racking up large legal bills, and then voluntarily dismiss the claims while remaining exempt from having to reimburse the responding party for its legal costs. Russian prosecutors frequently took aim at small religious organizations that lacked the ability to financially defend against the charges without the help of pro bono services offered by SCLJ lawyers.
The SCLJ appealed this law on behalf of the Church of Christians of Evangelical Faith in Blagoveschensk, Russia, after a Russian prosecutor, who was trying to make a name for himself, brought five frivolous lawsuits against it.
The Constitutional Court agreed with the SCLJ and held that when a prosecutor voluntarily waives a claim, the responding party, in this case the church, should be reimbursed its legal fees by the State.
This victory is important not only for religious organizations, but for all individuals who fall subject to frivolous or harassing lawsuits. Hopefully, this ruling will deter prosecutors from bringing unsubstantiated lawsuits against religious organizations.
You can read more about this important victory here.
The United Nations (U.N.) is once again accusing Israel of war crimes because Israel lawfully acted in self-defense in response to ongoing indiscriminate rocket attacks from Hamas. On June 22, 2015, the U.N.’s Independent Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) submitted its report to the United...
Man’s justice is not perfect, not even that of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that describes itself as “the conscience of Europe”. In a striking turn of events, it appears that the Court made a manifest legal error in the well known Lambert judgment ( Lambert and others v. France ,
Imagine this dramatic scenario: the White House pushes for the United States to abandon its historic role as protector of the Internet, transferring the last vestige of that authority over to a private organization populated by international tech gurus. But the gurus also hold seven smartcards that...
On April 1, 2015, the Palestinian Authority – along with its terrorist “Unity Government” partner Hamas – officially became a member “state” of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This is problematic for a number of reasons. First, since the Palestinian Authority (PA), known as “Palestine” by...