Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1308676509000

It's a critically important religious and human rights case and our international affiliate, the European Centre for Law and Justice, is at the forefront in protecting the rights of an Egypt man who is facing grave danger because of his decision to convert from Islam to Christianity.

We've just filed this case with the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion urging Egypt to legalize conversion from Islam to Christianity in accordance with International Human Rights standards.

I wanted to share with you a report from Grgor Puppinck, our director of the ECLJ in Strasbourg, France on this vital case:

The ECLJ has submitted a critical case to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion urging Egypt to legalize conversion from Islam to Christianity in accordance with International Human Rights standards.  The ECLJ submitted the case January 22nd on behalf of Mohammed Bishoy Hegazy v. The Arab Republic of Egypt.

A copy of the complaint is available here.

Hegazy, whose case and plight have gained international attention, is the first Egyptian convert from Islam to request legal recognition of his conversion in Egypt.  Born in 1982, he converted to Christianity in 1998.  Shortly after his conversion to Christianity, Egyptian police tortured him for three days and harassed him several times thereafter. In 2001, he was arrested for publishing a book of poems critical of the Egyptian state security police and the following year he was arrested and held for ten weeks in what some have described as 'concentration camp' conditions.
In early 2007, Hegazy attempted to register his change of religion with the Egyptian Interior Ministry, but Ministry officials rejected his request. In August 2007, Hegazy filed a case requesting official recognition of his conversion and to have the details on his identity card changed to reflect his new religious beliefs. Hegazy chose to file suit because he and his wife were expecting a child, who they would be legally required to raise as a Muslim unless they officially converted from Islam to Christianity. Hegazy and his wife wanted their child to be born a Christian, from Christian parents, so that their child could have a Christian name, receive a Christian education, and marry in a church.  Mr. Hegazy stated, "I think it is my natural right, to embrace the religion I believe."  Hegazy also stated that he brought the suit to establish a precedent upon which other Christian converts could rely.

When Hegazy filed his case, two academics from Al-Azhar University demanded his execution, and the minister for religious endowments publicly affirmed the legality of executing Muslims who convert to Christianity.  Hegazy was then forced into hiding after extremists surrounded his former house for several days and set fire to his neighbors residence, killing the female occupant (who was his wifes best friend).

In January 2008, the Supreme Administrative Court ruled against Hegazy, basing its ruling on Article 2 of the Egyptian Constitution and Sharia law.  Hegazy and his family remain in hiding, and are unable to leave the country, having been denied the necessary passports. Hegazys Egyptian attorneys received death threats from various sources. Currently, Hegazy is represented by Ashraf Edward in Egypt and ECLJ representatives outside Egypt.

According to Dr. Grgor Puppinck, the director of the ECLJ:  "This case will have a remarkable impact and affect every Egyptian who leaves Islam and converts to another religion.  It is our hope that those who want to see religious freedom can do so without fear of being harmed.  It is time for Egypt to recognize the legality of those who desire to convert from Islam to Christianity.  Since Egypt plays such a pivotal role in influencing other Islamic countries, it's important that those who choose to leave Islam and accept another religious affiliation are permitted to do so in accordance with international human rights standards."

In its complaint, the ECLJ argued that Egypts "one-way conversion policy" - allowing only conversion to Islam, violates religious freedom rights enshrined in the international covenant on civil and political rights.  In particular, the ECLJ asserts that this conversion policy directly violates the freedom to adopt, change, or renounce, a religion or belief and the right of parents to ensure the religious and moral education of their children, as proclaimed and guaranteed by international law.

The ECLJ also insisted that Egypts recognition of Islam as the state religion should not be a pretext to violate rights of non-Muslims. Whereas article 46 of the Egyptian Constitution guarantees officially freedom of religious belief and religious exercise, the violation of Human Rights and the rights of non-Muslims stems from article 2 of the Constitution which states that "the principle source of legislation is Islamic jurisprudence (Sharia)".  Therefore, the Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court has interpreted this provision to mean that no legislation can violate Sharia law.

The U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief will now directly question the Egyptian Government on this specific situation, initiating the process of review of Egyptians legislation on conversion.

In the weeks ahead, the ECLJ will continue to defend and promote the rights of the Egyptian Christians through the U.N. "Universal Periodic Review" (UPR) human rights mechanism.  Through it, the Human Rights Council will review the fulfillment by Egypt of its human rights, obligations, and commitments. The UPR is a cooperative mechanism, based on an interactive dialogue with the State under review. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) accredited to the ECOSOC such as the ECLJ are entitled to participate to this process.

The UPR working group will review the actions of Egypt during its session scheduled for February 17-19, 2010.  Three States (China, Madagascar and Italy) are in charge of drafting the Report on Egypt. That report will then be considered, discussed, and voted upon before the Human Rights Council in June 2010.

This is a case that many around the world are closely watching.  We will keep you posted as developments occur.


Continuing Anti-Israel Bias at UN

By Skip Ash1444338806822

Once again the United Nations (U.N.) has made a bad situation worse, issuing reckless statements in the wake of more jihadist murders of Israeli civilians. We’re taking direct action. Following closely on the heels of the recent public renunciation of the Oslo Accords by Palestinian Authority...

read more

Implications of the Palestinian...

By Skip Ash1443732176771

On September 30, 2015, Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian Authority, addressed the UN General Assembly in his role as “President of Palestine.” In his UN address , Mr. Abbas recited his rendition of the history of Palestine and, as he so often does, accused Israel of all manner of...

read more

Rouhani Spikes Nuclear Football

By Matthew Clark1443472533367

Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani spiked the nuclear football in his U.N. victory speech in New York this afternoon. Complete with threats against the “Zionist Regime” (Israel), blaming the U.S. for ISIS’s dominance in the Middle East, and empty promises about its nuclear ambitions, the president of...

read more

Another UN Attack Against Israel

By Marshall Goldman1435166544202

The United Nations (U.N.) is once again accusing Israel of war crimes because Israel lawfully acted in self-defense in response to ongoing indiscriminate rocket attacks from Hamas. On June 22, 2015, the U.N.’s Independent Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) submitted its report to the United...

read more