Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1307644702000

It is vital that all voices - especially those dedicated to the protection of religious freedom - are heard at the United Nations.  And for years now, our international affiliate, the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), has been active providing the U.N. with the kind of expert analysis that protects the views and beliefs of Christians, especially when they represent the minority in countries where the Muslim faith is the majority.  In many countries, as you know, Christians face terrible persecution because of their religious beliefs - often jailed, beaten, and murdered.
The ECLJ has just filed an important document with The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) at the UN - a follow-up to testimony we provided nearly three years ago when we began challenging the dangerous, anti-Christian concept known as "defamation of religions."    

As you know, for a number of years now, we've been aggressively opposing "defamation of religions" at the U.N. - a concept that's been promoted since 1999 by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in order to limit freedom of expression, provide an international legality to repressive laws working against religious minorities, and prohibit speeches critical of Islam.  In recent years, support for this resolution has continued to decline and we're hopeful that the trend will continue.
Now, the OHCHR has once again asked for input from non-governmental organizations and the ECLJ has filed a document outlining our concerns about safeguarding religious freedom as the UN focuses on a workshop 'on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred' in 2011.
Citing the blasphemy laws of Pakistan, where we are active defending Christians who face persecution because of their faith, the ECLJ report states:

"The history of Pakistans blasphemy laws represents how, if 'incitement' is viewed from the perspective of the individual or group claiming offence, the law can be used as a sword against the minority. This perspective defeats the original intent of 'incitement' lawsto shield the minorityand results in the destruction of free expression."

The ECLJ report concludes that as this issue is debated, "it is important to remember that public expressions by those with a sincerely held faith or religious morality should receive a superior level of protection. Those individuals or groups with sincerely held religious beliefs must be free to criticize or comment . . . These public expressions of faith or religious morality should not be liable to prosecution simply because the tenets of the faith oppose certain ideas or practices . . . Society must not fear debate, for it is through open discussion that ideas should be countered and respect given to a diversity of views."
You can read the entire ECLJ report here.
We're working in this country and abroad to ensure that the rights of Christians are protected.  We will keep you posted as this issue develops.

Rescuing Child Brides in Kenya

By ACLJ.org1437679826805

One of our international affiliates in Africa, the East African Centre for Law and Justice (EACLJ), just assisted in rescuing two young girls facing mutilation and a form of sex slavery as child brides, and our legal team is working to end this barbaric practice. The following is a report from our...

read more

Another UN Attack Against Israel

By Marshall Goldman1435166544202

The United Nations (U.N.) is once again accusing Israel of war crimes because Israel lawfully acted in self-defense in response to ongoing indiscriminate rocket attacks from Hamas. On June 22, 2015, the U.N.’s Independent Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) submitted its report to the United...

read more

ECHR Made A Legal Error

By Gregor Puppinck1435159416720

Man’s justice is not perfect, not even that of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that describes itself as “the conscience of Europe”. In a striking turn of events, it appears that the Court made a manifest legal error in the well known Lambert judgment ( Lambert and others v. France ,

read more

The President’s ICANN Internet Problem

By Craig Parshall1433186071131

Imagine this dramatic scenario: the White House pushes for the United States to abandon its historic role as protector of the Internet, transferring the last vestige of that authority over to a private organization populated by international tech gurus. But the gurus also hold seven smartcards that...

read more