The real debate now begins over the Supreme Court nominee announced by President Obama. The record and judicial philosophy of Judge Sonia Sotomayor will be examined closely, as it should, even before confirmation hearings begin this summer in the U.S. Senate.
The ACLJ continues to research her opinions and public statements. We've prepared an initial report on Judge Sotomayor. You can read it here.
The fact is that her nomination will generate a lot of debate - specifically on the topic of judicial activism. It will involve a close look at her record, her judicial temperament, and her philosophy about the Constitution and the rule of law.
While no schedule has been set yet regarding confirmation hearings, we're hopeful that members of the Senate Judiciary Committee will ask the tough questions required.
One topic that will likely come up - her comments recorded on videotape. She stated that the 'court of appeals is where policy is made.' It's a statement that already has the attention of many - including Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. While Senator Sessions said lawmakers must give Judge Sotomayor a fair opportunity to explain the remark, he said that "on its face, it's troubling." We agree.
Everyone understands that the President sometimes violates the Constitution. Everyone also understands that sometimes Congress violates the Constitution. Is it not obvious, then, that the Supreme Court, likewise being composed of fallible human beings, sometimes violates the Constitution? Each...
A Supreme Court session, or “term,” opens each year around the first of July and closes around the end of the following June. That is why many major Supreme Court opinions are issued near the end of June. Expect fireworks in late June. The current Supreme Court term involves many important cases.
The controversial issue of affirmative action is once again before the U.S. Supreme Court, with oral arguments set this week in a case that has generated a lot of attention. The case involves a challenge by a student who was denied admission to the University of Texas, claiming the denial was based...
Today’s Supreme Court decision in FCC v. Fox leaves intact the public indecency laws of all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The ACLJ filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court urging it to do just that. The ACLJ’s brief in this challenge to a Federal Communications Commission (FCC)